Cop fired over anti-gay emails
11.26.2008 1:00pm EST
(London) A British police officer who sent emails to other officers condemning homosexuality and calling for gays to seek the help of a controversial American Christian group that claims to “cure” gays has been fired for misconduct.
Constable Graham Cogman, 49, accused the Norfolk police of promoting gay rights over religious beliefs. The emails contained biblical quotes and in one mailing said ”love the sinner hate the deed” after calling homosexuality “sinful.”Another email espoused the so-called “ex-gay” movement and said there was scientific evidence homosexuality was a matter of choice that could be cured. As evidence, he cited a U.S. group that has been discredited by both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association.
Cogman used police department computers to send the emails, and began his campaign two years ago after the force’s gay liaison unit circulated an email encouraging staff to wear a pink ribbon on uniforms during Gay History Month.
Cogman was ordered to stop sending “offensive mailings” using police computers. But the following year, he stepped up his campaign after the liaison unit asked officers to wear a rainbow ribbon during gay pride.
Cogman in one email claimed gays were usurping the rainbow which “symbolized God’s faithfulness.”
He also was accused of victimizing a gay liaison officer.
An internal police tribunal this week found Cogman guilty of failing to comply with a lawful order over the use of police computers and with failing to treat a colleague with respect and tolerance.
“The outcome follows a thorough investigation with evidence presented to a misconduct panel of three, two of whom were independent of the constabulary,” said Deputy Chief Constable Ian Learmonth.
“This officer’s behavior fell well below what we expect of our people. We require an absolute commitment from all our staff to treat colleagues with politeness, tolerance and respect, regardless of their beliefs, race, age, gender or sexual orientation.”
Gogman has not said if he will appeal.




Haha, if this had happened in the US, the cop would get a raise, a parade, and a day named in his honor.
This kind of thing can’t be allowed. Next thing you know you have email wars between members of different faiths demanding each other to convert. Believe what you want on your own time, but at work you have to keep your judgements to yourself.
probable queer himself
I agree with you Kerry, most likely a closet case (and a basket case) all in one.
Right on RMNY,thanks for the laugh.
I see that Gogman’s religious (Christian?) views led to his homophobia. Further evidence that most religious views are toxic. I fear the “Love Ethic” espoused by Jesus is lost in the shuffle….
Justice? I’d have to say not. The guy could have handled his homophobia differently, but firing him? I donno…I don’t know the whole story but people have the right to believe any way they please, as long as it doesn’t affect how they treat others. Maybe the guy is good cop?
Maybe this is a case of reverse discrimination?
I mean, come on….
Anyway, what’s being reported in this case probably isn’t the whole story AND if his department asked him to wear a pink ribbon or a rainbow to signify his allegiance with our cause and he didn’t want to, that’s basically the exact same situation.
It’s about free speech and such, you know?
@Malaz…
This isn’t a matter of somebody who is being fired for having a differing opinion or not supporting the same causes as his employers. “Cogman was ordered to stop sending “offensive mailings” using police computers.”
He was ordered to stop using his employer’s assets to spread offensive messages. My guess is that if he used his computer at home, then he wouldn’t be in this trouble.
The police aren’t analgolous to the check out counter at Wal-Mart. They’re a paramilitary force with a strict top-down hierarchy. And they’re agents of the State (i.e. the Crown). Although police officers have more civil liberties than “active duty” members of the armed services, they’re still expected to maintain a similar sense of discipline and order.
Disobeying a direct order from a superior in the chain of command? That qualifies as insubordination. And as such, can constitute grounds for dismissal in most police departments.