November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Conservatives battle Gainesville trans rights law


(Gainesville, Florida) A blond girl heads from a playground into a women’s restroom. A scruffy man, lurking outside, darts in behind her. “Your City Commission Made This Legal,” the words on the TV screen read.

The dark ad came from opponents of a gender identity provision added last year to the city’s anti-discrimination ordinance, which now allows the city’s roughly 100 transgender residents to use whichever restroom they’re most comfortable using.

Foes want to repeal the new protection with a March 24 ballot measure that has divided Gainesville, a generally gay-friendly university city surrounded by staunchly conservative north Florida.

Those who support the transgender protections say their opponents are really unleashing a broader attack on the rights of gay, lesbian and transgender individuals in general.

The city commission approved the restroom provision by a 4-3 vote a year ago. Before the ink could dry, Bible-quoting opponents angrily began working for its repeal.

“You are trying to operate in a realm you do not have the authority to operate in,” one pastor, George Brantley, told the commissioners.

The debate is expected to become noisier as the ballot nears with opponents resorting to more TV ads and campaigns pegged to such slogans as “Keep Men out of Women’s Restrooms and vice versa.”

Organizations defending transgender rights are mustering their own campaign.

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force notes 108 cities and counties nationwide have similar transgender protections. An attempt to repeal an ordinance in Montgomery County, Md., failed when a court ruled opponents did not collect enough signatures to place it on the ballot.

Citizens for Good Public Policy, the group behind the commercial that aired last summer in Gainesville, collected more than 6,000 signatures last summer to win a referendum. If approved, the repeal measure would also prevent the commission from adding protections beyond what the state requires: race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability and marital status.

Cain Davis, chairman of Citizens for Good Public Policy, said the issue is about regulating a “government gone wild” and ensuring public safety, charging that sexual predators could now simply enter a women’s restroom claiming to be a transgender individual.

“We know when men go into women’s restrooms, bad things can happen,” Davis said.

City Commissioner Craig Lowe, leader of a group called Equality is Gainesville’s Business, called the ads from Davis’ group a grossly distorted attempt to whip up fears.

Lowe’s group believes anti-discrimination protections for people who change their sexual orientation are good for business and foster diversity. He noted that 433 of the Fortune 500 companies have policies covering sexual orientation and 153 cover gender identity.

Since the ordinance took effect, police have reported no problems in public restrooms stemming from the law.

Retired postal worker Donna Lee, who became a female with surgery in 2001, moved to Gainesville from Ocala last March after hearing about the anti-discrimination ordinance. The 60-year-old is working to save the protections.

“We just want to live our lives with the basic civil rights that everyone else has,” Lee said.

But some are taking no chances.

Computer programmer Clare Holman, who was born male but now lives as a female, said she simply stays away from public toilets.

“I don’t want to run afoul of the law by using the wrong restroom,” Holman said.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Bud Burgoon-Clark Said: January 26th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
    • Are transsexual / transgender / intersex cases of rape and/or child molestation numerous enough to even BE on the RADAR? *I’ve* never heard of one, and I’ve worked in large urban GLBTQAI communities all of my adult life.

      As far as conservatives’ scare ads, two points:

      NO CHILD, male OR female, should be allowed to use a public toilet without an adult accompanying them. Yes, this gets to be a problem with opposite-sex single parents; perhaps robotic “one-holers” *are* the answer … they’d certainly be *cleaner* than most public toilets.

      2. There is NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING to prevent a rapist or a child molester from entering a public toilet NOW. (see #1, above). That’s scary, but that’s the world we live in. *I* don’t use public toilets unless it’s ABSOLUTELY necessary, and I’m 64 years old and in a wheelchair!

      Cheers,

      Bud Burgoon-Clark
      San Diego CA USA

  • Summer Said: January 26th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
    • responding to Sean Galadar. I know that there are unisex bathrooms, but it really doesn’t seem to address the point. I’m female, I use the women’s restroom. I go in use it and leave, I don’t do it to leer at other women. I don’t understand why this is such a big issue with conservatives. I’m more scared of using the bathroom sometimes than I think cisgendered women would be. Besides, what am I to do while I wait for the unisex bathrooms to be built, cross my legs and wait? :)

  • SteveMD2 Said: January 19th, 2009 at 12:44 am
    • We beat the religious creeps in montgomery county, and it can be done there also. If you guys will contribute some money to “Equality is Gainsvilles biz”. I am kinda tapped out after 30k for Prop 8 defeat (came close) and $3k for Montgomery county MD – we beat the religious freaks. Trans prot. stayed.

  • Sean Galadar Said: January 12th, 2009 at 10:30 pm
    • There are alternatives: provide single restrooms of the robot type that we have in Australia which are not gender specific; or follow the model more common in Europe of unisex restrooms with cubicles only (no urinals). Or the transgender people could be required to continue to use the separate, non-gender-specific disabled toilets which should already have been provided by any enlightened municipality.

  • Chris Sullivan Said: January 12th, 2009 at 10:23 am
    • If Prop. 8 taught us anything – it should be not to pussy-foot around the issue. The general population isn’t as delicate or misinformed as the “No on 8″ campaign seemed to think.

      Confront the issue head on! State why these other ads are intentionally misleading or blatantly distortions.

      Expose their lies with the truth. If people still vote against trans-people, it will just show that more education and visibility is still necessary. Hopefully, common sense will prevail.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook