Comments on: Conservative Anglican leaders urge change

By: bama-stu

bama-stu — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:11:09 +0000

What suprises me somewhat is the medias constant focus on the conservative Anglicans who want to leave the national church. What nobody seems to focus on is the overwhelming majority of U.S. Anglicans who are not leaving the Church, but are quite happy to stay exactly where they are. If you look at the Church overall in the U.S., the number of people staying within the Church far exceeds the number leaving.

By: Raymond H. Clark

Raymond H. Clark — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:48:05 +0000

And I suppose “pursuing God’s divine purposes” includes the MURDER of African gays and lesbians.

Akinola should be HUNG for his role in African GLBTQAI GENOCIDE.

And the Arch-Weasel of Canterbury has blood on HIS hands for not condemning the schismatic, heretical, MURDEROUS “anglicans” who have gathered around Akinola.

Aside from Bishop Spong, the US Episcopal hierarchy’s response has ranged from muted to silent.

And where are all the human rights groups? Are they afraid to speak because this is a “religious” issue?

So was the Holocaust.

Bud Burgoon-Clark
San Diego, CA USA

By: Drewski

Drewski — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:27:14 +0000

The ugly truth that the conservatives don’t want to address is that the faster-growing part of the Anglican Communion is in countries which are not rich when compared to the US, Canada or the UK. Those conservatives are angling for a way to keep all that nice First World money and spend it on a Third World church. There aren’t that many ideological differences between what conservative Anglicans want and what they could get from the Catholic Church, so as Jay said, let ‘em go to Rome. But they can leave the money behind.

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:54:09 +0000

Let the bastards go to Rome (or have they forgotten why the Church of England was formed in the first place?).