March 15th, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

Call in gay: Grassroots protest against Prop 8


(San Francisco, California) Some same-sex marriage supporters are urging people to “call in gay” Wednesday to show how much the country relies on gays and lesbians, but others question whether it’s wise to encourage skipping work given the nation’s economic distress.

Organizers of “Day Without a Gay” – scheduled to coincide with International Human Rights Day and modeled after similar work stoppages by Latino immigrants – also are encouraging people to perform volunteer work and refrain from spending money.

Sean Hetherington, a West Hollywood comedian and personal trainer, dreamed up the idea with his boyfriend, Aaron Hartzler, after reading online that a few angry gay-rights activists were calling for a daylong strike to protest California voters’ passage last month of Proposition 8, which reversed this year’s state Supreme Court decision allowing gay marriage.

The couple thought it would be more effective and less divisive if people were asked to perform community service instead of staying home with their wallets shut. Dozens of nonprofit agencies, from the National Women’s Law Center in Washington to a Methodist church in Fresno collecting food for the homeless, have posted opportunities for volunteers on the couple’s Web site.

“We are all for a boycott if that is what brings about a sense of community for people,” said Hetherington, 30, who plans to spend Wednesday volunteering at an inner-city school. “You can take away from the economy and give back in other ways.”

Hetherington said he’s been getting 100 e-mails an hour from people looking for volunteer opportunities, and that his “Day Without a Gay” Web site has gotten 100,000 hits since mid-November.

Despite Hartzler and Hetherington’s attempt to fashion a positive approach, some organizers of the street demonstrations that drew massive crowds in many cities last month have been reluctant to embrace the concept, saying that it could be at best impractical and at worst counterproductive to “call in gay.”

“It’s extra-challenging for people to think about taking off work as a form of protest, given that we are talking about people who may not be out (as gay) at work, and given the current economic situation and job market,” said Jules Graves, 38, coordinator of the Colorado Queer Straight Alliance. “There is really not any assurance employers would appreciate it for what it is.”

Graves’ group nonetheless is arranging for interested participants to volunteer at the local African Community Center in Denver. The agency said it could find projects to keep 20 people busy, but so far only 10 have pledged to show up, said Graves.

Scott Craig, a fifth-grade teacher at Independence Charter School in Philadelphia, had no problem requesting and being granted the day off. So many of the school’s 60 teachers were eager to show support for gay rights they had to make sure enough stayed behind to staff classrooms.

About 25 teachers plan to take Wednesday off and to have their work covered by substitutes while they discuss ways to introduce gay issues to their students and volunteer at the local branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, Craig said. A letter telling parents why so many teachers would be out went home Monday.

“We want to get the conversation going in the community that gay is not bad,” Craig said. “For kids to hear that in a positive light can be life-changing.”

Join The Impact, the online community that launched protests last month over the passage of gay marriage bans in California, Florida and Arizona, has urged people to withdraw $80 from their bank accounts Wednesday to demonstrate gays’ spending power, and to devote the time they might otherwise spend watching TV or surfing the Internet to volunteer work.

Witeck-Combs Communications, a public relations firm in Washington that specializes in the gay and lesbian market, published a study this year that estimated that gay and lesbian consumers spend $700 billion annually.

Bob Witeck, the firm’s chief executive officer, said it would be difficult to measure the success of Wednesday’s strike since gay employees occupy so many fields. And rather than suspending all consumer spending for the day, gay rights supporters would have a bigger impact if they devoted their dollars to gay-friendly businesses year-round, Witeck said.

“Our community leaders who are running book stores, newspapers, flower shops, coffee houses, bars and many, many other things are hurting right now, so paying attention to their needs during this hard time is an effective form of activism,” he said.

Hetherington said he has been careful to design A Day Without a Gay – he came up with the name after the film “A Day Without a Mexican” and liked it because it rhymed – so no one feels excluded or threatened.

He has specifically urged high school students not to walk out of their classes and assured college students they won’t be disloyal to the cause if they go ahead and take their final exams. He also has listed opportunities – ranging from writing letters to members of Congress about federal gay rights legislation to spreading the word about Wednesday on social networking sites – for gay marriage backers who cannot miss work.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Joanna Williams Said: December 9th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
    • I won’t be calling in gay. I’ll be at work, being my usual hardworking gay self. This “gesture” is as ineffective as everything else the “gay leadership” dreams up. I’m beginning to think there is an unconscious desire at work to forever marginalize our community.

  • Hylan Said: December 9th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
    • Honestly who thinks of these things! will the organizers pay our bills when we all lose our jobs for calling in gay! I’m African American and I wouldn’t call in Black on MLK day either “silly just silly” girl I got bills to pay, so do the rest of us hard working brothers and sisters, really find a better plan to protest prop 8 and perhaps we will be better persauded nationallly!

  • Martin in Phoenix Said: December 9th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
    • Although I don’t agree with the “Calling In Gay” thing, only because there are still a lot of fellow LGBTQ members out there who are at risk of losing their jobs not only for calling in Gay, but simply for being gay…I do agree, at least, with the idea of “boycotting” retailers and shops that are not LGBTQ-friendly and/or volunteer or donate to your local gay-friendly charity or organization. At least that way we know our time and money is going towards something that matters to us a community.

  • hx Said: December 9th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
    • really really silly idea. Why? Because it will fail like all of these boycotts fail. Day without a mexican failed. Oil company strike day failed. I have absolutely no intention of participating in this ill conceived and rather vacuous gesture.

  • ken Said: December 9th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
    • how about a year without gay, how about 10 years, how about forever?

      how about gays shut up and act like the 5% of the population they are

      Quit trying to convince me and my children that it’s “OK” to be a queer. If it was natural you’d be built different than normal people so you could not breed with us.

  • Sean Martin Said: December 9th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
    • Whatsa matter, Kennie? Wife wont put out?

  • TheRadicalRealist Said: December 9th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
    • ken…That’s funny, that’s not what your sister told me last night.

  • ken's ex Said: December 9th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
    • Ken, sweetie; I think that it’s about time you started wearing your magic underwear over your face, rather than where you usually wear it!!

  • Marc Said: December 9th, 2008 at 7:02 pm
    • I have already arranged to be out of work tommorrow to volunteer. Even if you are not calling out of work, please consider participating in the economic boycott!

  • Trace Said: December 9th, 2008 at 7:08 pm
    • Thank Gawd that no one knows about this fiasco. Let’s just hope and pray that none of the news sources pick up on this horrid idea display what a horrible failure it is.

      First lesson of demonstrating is don’t attempt to do something that is so ill conceived and so detrimental to your cause.

  • Will Said: December 9th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
    • Devils advocate

  • Mike Masters Said: December 9th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
    • Wow, what a great idea… do something that hurts other people and put ‘gay’ branding on it.

  • Scott Said: December 10th, 2008 at 12:36 am
    • This is a ridiculous idea. My employer gives gay people the same benefits as straight ones, and is very open and accepting. Why would I want to hurt them by not showing up for work?

      I think an even better plan would be for us to FLAUNT our wealth for a day. Let the straight people losing their jobs and houses see how well off we are and laugh in their faces!

  • Dave Said: December 10th, 2008 at 1:43 am
    • I am getting so sick of what the gay community is doing. i am bi and the way the gay community is acting im starting to not want anything to do with you all. You all preach to be equal and kind and loving. well im sorry you are totally going against what you are preaching to the world. you expect the church to care for you all when you are burning books of mormon, damaging churches, threatening members, etc. im sorry if this is to get married, you dont deserve it. when the black race was righting for their civil rights, they werent doing anything you are doing. im ashamed of what you are doing.

  • TANK Said: December 10th, 2008 at 2:23 am
    • I don’t deserve it, davie? (”I”–because as far as you and I are concerned, you’re not in my community. And further, you have access to those rights, breeder.) Why? What rioting? And damaging churches compared to funding bigotry and promoting it? That’s awful that a book of disturbed rantings that an accident of history has rendered “sacrosanct” by people who don’t think was burned in response to taking away rights. Who’s worse off at the end of the day, huh? Who’s the real victim here? The people with all of their rights intact who suffered the inconvenience of being called bigots for being…bigots…or those whose rights were taken from them? That’s a rhetorical question, and you can look that word up in the dictionary if you own one. I doubt you do.

      But more to the point, who’s defending those trumped up media martyrdom events (church spokespeople and members lying, exaggerrating and victimizing themselves while blaming others), though? No one. So that all of a sudden means that all gays and lesbians (you aren’t one of us, thank GOD) don’t deserve marriage equality. Somehwere in the recesses of your feeble mind, I’m sure that those are related. You’re an astonishingly stupid person, Dave. It’s not an insult, though–it’s a neutral description like the color of your hair.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook