March 21st, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

California Equality: Wait til 2012 to attack gay marriage ban


(San Francisco) California gay rights activists are at odds over when to ask voters to repeal the state’s same-sex marriage ban, with one of the largest groups saying it needs until 2012 to put together a winning campaign and two others saying they plan go to the polls next year.

For months, organizers have been weighing the best strategy for gaining back marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples following their devastating loss last fall, when voters passed Proposition 8 banning same-sex nuptials just months after the California Supreme Court ruled to allow them.

Outrage at the defeat caused gay rights activists to spill into the streets, their anger galvanizing supporters in California and elsewhere to push forward.

Yet at the same time, a rift developed among California activists, with critics claiming the failed “No on 8″ campaign had focused too intensely on liberal enclaves along the coast and did not effectively reach more conservative areas of the state, or minorities.

Equality California, which led the “No on 8″ charge, said Wednesday that holding off until 2012 gives organizers more time to raise money and win over residents in those conservative areas. The group also said turnout in a presidential election year will be higher than in next year’s gubernatorial race and will include more young people who tend to favor gay marriage.

“Emotionally, we all want to win marriage back as quickly as possible,” said Marc Solomon, Equality California’s marriage director. “We really think that we have a shot in the next three years. But we have one shot, we don’t have two shots. We’re not waiting at all. We’re going hard. But we think the campaign is a three-year campaign.”

Meanwhile, Los Angeles-based Courage Campaign announced in an e-mail to supporters Wednesday it would push to get a measure on the 2010 ballot. And John Henning, head of Love Honor Cherish, said his group also would continue to focus on next year.

“If you tell people that they’re going to have to wait, a lot of people are going to lose interest,” Henning said. “They’re going to make other commitments, they’re going to get the message that this isn’t important enough to act now.”

The anger over losing marriage rights – as well as the momentum from legalization in New Hampshire, Connecticut, Vermont and Iowa – have been strong arguments to launch the earliest campaign possible.

Even Equality California was eyeing 2010 immediately after Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote.

But Solomon said recent interviews with donors, sympathetic clergy, political consultants and organizations that work with gay families advised waiting for 2012.

He said it was unrealistic to quickly raise the needed cash – likely $40 million to $50 million – in a bad economy, especially when big donors are being asked to give to social service organizations whose budgets have been slashed.

The 2008 fight cost supporters and opponents $83 million.

Both Equality California and the Courage Campaign allowed for a possible change in strategy. Solomon said he would not rule out playing a role if an initiative does make it to the ballot next year.

And Courage Campaign Chairman Rick Jacobs said before his group can take the battle in California to voters, it must help other states fighting to legalize same-sex marriage, including Maine, which became poised to recognize the unions when lawmakers in May set aside a state law defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Gay marriage opponents want to force a November vote in Maine to outlaw the nuptials, and Jacobs said the Courage Campaign needs to be involved in that fight.

Voters in 29 states have approved state constitutional amendments that ban gay marriage.

Meanwhile, an effort to legalize gay marriage in California is also playing out in federal court. On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco said he is dissatisfied with all the court filings meant to lay out the important legal issues and key evidence, and ordered new submissions with more details.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Jay Said: August 13th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
    • ECQA is so timid. Because they screwed up last time, they are afraid to be blamed if it loses again. They need to get out of the way and let other groups lead. It is not a question of blaming African Americans and other minorities: it is to note that the demographics favor us in 2010 more than they will in 2012. In 2012, our enemies will be making robocalls with Obama saying that he does is against same-sex marriage. (The dummies that ran the 2008 campaign did not even use a letter from Obama saying that he was opposed to proposition 8.) Of course, we have to try to win over minorities and even the Republicans, but when we have 49% of the voters in our favor it is folly to wait until 2012: that says that marriage equality isn’t a very important issue for us.

  • charley Said: August 14th, 2009 at 8:16 am
    • This seems symptomatic of the lack of direction that plagued the no on 8 campaign from the beginning.

  • bama-stu Said: August 14th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
    • Regardless of whether it is 2010 or 2012, if Barack Obama would step up the plate and say, in a public arena, that he is for repealing Proposition Eight then we will have a large number of people on our side. Until he steps up and does what he needs to do, things will be a lot slower than we want them to be.

  • AriG3 Said: August 14th, 2009 at 8:38 pm
    • I see both sides of the argument but California should really take advantage of the economic climate. If you think we are having a hard time raising cash can you imagine the other side? They rely on 10% of ones income and given the circumstance 10% of 0 is not that much. Sounds ugly but when your opponent is down you don’t wait until they stagger back up. You kick like crazy until you get your way. As for donations, leverage your moral high ground and get people to donate talent and materials instead of money, hell if you need I can help you launch a public relations campaign in Spanish. Ill do for free. Also think about it if you loose in 2010 you learn and establish public interest. If your quiet until 2012 you risk the chance of a repeat with the presidential election, granted Obama might not be as popular in four years as he is now. Particularly if we do not see a bounce back in the economic situation. Granted housing prices probably wont start to bounce back on average until Q4 2010 or Q1 2011, and the republicans are going to gain seats in 2010 making the Dems efforts to mobilize churches even stronger. So if you want to put your chips on 2012 go for it I say make a presence in 2010 if it doesn’t work out, make connections at a grass roots level and keep on. There is no excuse, and gayactivist101 we as a voting bloc need to play both parties, if one doesn’t work we need to find a way to pit them against each other. Liberals shouldn’t have a monopoly on the gay vote, they haven’t done much for us. In closing its all about resources and God knows the GLBT community in Cali has access to a lot of resources.

  • Busty_StClair2009 Said: August 15th, 2009 at 3:16 am
    • I just think its ididotic that they change there minds i Mean come on….. Lets allow Same sex Marriage, Turn around ohh no i think we can ban it… Make up your minds…lol..

  • Lori Hahn Said: August 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am
    • Hellooooo? Did not this last debacle, shot in the foot at every turn by bad messaging to the wrong audience, bad PR advice, and an overabundance of organizations – all asking for handouts three times a week not clue anyone in?

      Until we can get one group – and leadership totally not into self-aggrandizement who can work with other points of view (has anyone heard of a multi-pronged approach?) – to cohesively plot this out, we’re going to lose again.

      Use 2010 to figure out the message and audience. Use 2011 to do the major fundraising. Take it to the streets in 2012.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook