Calif. gay marriage ban becomes big money race
10.27.2008 9:13am EDT
(San Francisco, California) At least 64,000 people from all 50 states and more than 20 other countries have given money to support or oppose a same-sex marriage ban in California, reflecting broad interest in the race that some consider second in national importance only to the presidential election.
Ten days before the vote on Proposition 8, campaign finance records show that total contributions for and against the measure have surpassed $60 million, according to an analysis by The Associated Press.That would be a record nationally for a ballot initiative based on a social rather than economic issue, campaign finance experts say. It also eclipses the combined total of $33 million spent in the 24 states where similar measures have been put to voters since 2004.
If approved by California voters, Proposition 8 would overturn the state Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriages by changing the state constitution to limit marriage to a man and a woman.
Campaign committees formed to back or battle the amendment were close in fundraising as of Oct. 25, AP’s analysis found. Supporters had raised at least $28.2 million; opponents had taken in $32.3 million, closing a fundraising gap that had them $8 million behind a month ago.
The figures for each side are actually higher because small cash donations made since Sept. 30 had not yet been reported.
The measure is likely to attract more money than any race other than the billion-dollar presidential election, judging by campaign-finance data from other high-profile contests. The closest appears to be the U.S. Senate race in Minnesota, at $35 million.
“I’m surprised how much they are spending because I would have thought 90 percent of the people would have made up their minds on this issue,” said Robert Stern, president of the nonpartisan Center for Governmental Studies. “But if this is a close race, that undecided 10 percent will decide the election. Every dollar, in a sense, counts.”
The money pouring into the 13 committees promoting or challenging the measure has come from prominent religious conservatives and gay rights activists, Hollywood actors and moguls, teachers and CEOs.
Individuals who identified themselves as retirees and homemakers accounted for the most donations, giving more than $11 million. Self-identified lawyers gave $2.3 million.
On the “Yes” side, Knights of Columbus, based in New Haven, Conn., is the measure’s largest single contributor so far, having given $1.4 million. Other top contributors to the Yes on 8 campaign were Irvine banking heir Howard Ahmanson Jr.’s Fieldstead and Co. foundation ($1.1 million); John Templeton Jr., son of the late Bryn Mawr, Pa., investor John Templeton ($900,000); the Tupelo, Miss.-based American Family Association ($500,000), and Elsa Prince, ($450,000), mother of Blackwater founder Erik Prince.
Knights of Columbus spokesman Patrick Korten said the Catholic fraternal organization has backed amendments limiting marriage to a man and a woman in every state where they have appeared. But none of the group’s other contributions has come close to what the Knights are putting into the Proposition 8 race.
“California is the thousand-pound gorilla when it comes to laws of this sort,” Korten said. “California is the big one, so everybody is involved in this who cares about the issue. You can’t not be.”
On the “No” side, wealthy individuals making million-dollar gifts account for all but one of the gay marriage ban’s top six opponents. The California Teachers Association, the state’s largest teachers union, is first, having pledged $1.3 million to fight the initiative.
Giving $1 million or more were retired New York hedge fund manager Robert W. Wilson; GeoCities founder David Bohnett; Jon Stryker, an heir to a Michigan media supplies company; WordPerfect software founder and Utah resident Bruce Bastian, and philanthropist David Maltz of Cleveland.
“I think this is a civil liberties issue, and California tends to be a bellwether state in this country and what happens there often spreads around,” said Wilson, a longtime patron of the New York Public Library and the Whitney Museum of American Art. “I don’t see any argument in favor of barring queer marriage.”
The contest also has drawn contributions from notable names in government, business and entertainment, most opposing the measure. Among them: Hollywood producer Stephen Bing ($500,000); actor Brad Pitt ($100,000); producer George Lucas and Lucas Films ($100,000 combined); director Steven Spielberg and his wife, actress Kate Capshaw ($100,000); talk show host Ellen DeGeneres ($100,000); House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s campaign fund ($10,000); audio systems inventor Ray Dolby and his wife, Dagmar, ($135,000) and personal finance guru Suze Orman ($10,000.)
Nearly three-quarters of the total contributions have been from individuals or institutions based in California, with the rest from out of state or from 90 international donors, representing nations from England to Italy and Thailand to Taiwan. Nearly all international contributors opposed the measure.
The measure’s opponents received a greater share of their money from outside the state or country – 33 percent compared to the 19 percent of out-of-state contributions reported by the initiative’s backers.
Apart from California, New York ($2.5 million), Michigan ($1.6 million), Utah (1.5 million) and Connecticut ($1.4 million), are the states whose residents and institutions have invested the most in the contest. Connecticut is about to become the third U.S. state to sanction same-sex marriage.
Campaign spending on Proposition 8 dwarfs the total of $11.3 million channeled into gay marriage measures this year in Florida and Arizona.
“This is the ball game. There is no other battle than this one, with all due respect to my colleagues in Arizona and Florida,” said Frank Schubert, the professional campaign manager for Yes on 8. “If you are concerned about marriage and how it gets to be defined, this is where it will be decided.”




Good for you, Wayne! So many of us in GLBT community refuse to be Obama-Zombies. Too many Uncle Gay Tom’s for the DEMS around here. That is why the DEMS take us for granted. Let’s see how supportive the Black community, or any other minority community with any self-respect, would respond if some presidential candidate spoke down to them like Barrack has done to us. How shameful.
SEPARATE, BUT EQUAL (?) = GAY PRIDE — What a joke!!!
Wayne,
Perhaps you missed THESE nuggets too …
“Last week, Palin endorsed passage of the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would amend the U.S. Constitution to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain supports a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage in his home state of Arizona”
“Palin, during an interview with the Christian Broadcasting News, said she had supported a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in Alaska and she wants a similar ban at the federal level.
“I wish on a federal level that that’s where we would go because I don’t support gay marriage,” Palin told the interviewer.”
Could it be any clearer why gay people shouldn’t vote for Mrs. Palin and Mr. McBush, Wayne?
They may well be your friends; they’re certainly not ours.
Congratulations Bud Clark to you and your partner!!! Let’s hope someday those pushing Yes on 8 have to endure a 35-year “engagement!”
I married my same-sex partner on Sept. 15th at the San Diego County Court House, after a 35-year “engagement.” We’re are both elderly and disabled. I have severe arthritis. I was married in a wheelchair, and sometimes my hands swell and I have to take off my wedding ring. It doesn’t feel right. It feels like something ESSENTIAL is missing. I HAVE to be able to see it or feel it … in front of me on the desk, or around my neck on a chain. I ADORE my partner; we have stood by each other in sickness and in health for DECADES. NO Konservative Kristianist Krazy is going to take THAT away from me.
Bud Clark
San Diego CA USA
Meanwhile, apart from Wayne’s foolishness, it really doesn’t matter – in the long run (though it inconveniences us in the short run) – if this foolish proposition passses -for it, too, will ultimately be struck down by the CA SC as UN-Constitutional – which it cearly IS – since it denies a segment of the citizenry equal treatment before the law.
Wayne,
I cordially invite you to actually READ the following thread…
Biden opposes Calif. gay marriage ban; Palin calls for federal amendment
and then tell us the Rethuglicans are in OUR (not YOUR) corner on this.
Please folks, just stop replying to Wayne, it only encourages him.
I agree with Pat, “We are queer, not stupid”. Time to give it a rest Wayne.
Yes folks! Please keep up the support. Call your relatives and friends in California and let them know how important this is.
I married my husband in California and I want everyone to have that opportunity in the future.
On a side note, there are too many Marks or Marcs on here. I’m the Mark from Chicago, not Canada, and it’s spelled with a “k” but I’m changing to a different handle to cut down on confusion.
Oh, I see Wayne is back. Bashing Barack as usual (w/o mentioning the “Benefits” Mcsame will give us. Ha!). Give it up, dude, we are queer, not stupid!!
And, as goes California goes the nation!! Keep the money pouring in. I want to STAY married to the love of my life!!
When it comes time to vote, I’m always appalled by the lack of concern by some of the gay people I personally know!!
If gay people expect to win equal marriage rights, we MUST ALL get out and VOTE! Our enemies do!
Please! Please! Urge all of your gay friends, straight friends, etc., get out and vote NO to proposition 8; there won’t be another chance!
Equal marriage in California!
Maybe I’m missing something here but I thought that the Mormons were one of the biggest contributors to the “yes” side. Here we go again, the church preaching it’s own agenda and not the teachings of their so-called leader, Jesus.
So Obama just announced what issues that he plans to spend time on and that will be important to him as president. It’s interesting that he does not mention gay rights or our fight for equality at all. In fact Obama goes out of his way to ensure people are aware that under his rule there will be no “lurches to the left” and definately no time for “crazy things”.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Obama_promises_no_time_for_crazy_things_under_Dem_rule.html