<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian MP opposes same-sex adoption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveMD2</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-2/#comment-85552</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveMD2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-85552</guid>
		<description>The US is far behind Australia.  I was talking with an Australian today. His country grants all the rights of marriage via common law - I think it takes two years of cohabitation.  The one issue other then the delay is adoption.

If only the USA was so advanced. The situation shows that criminals are less criminal then religious zealots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US is far behind Australia.  I was talking with an Australian today. His country grants all the rights of marriage via common law &#8211; I think it takes two years of cohabitation.  The one issue other then the delay is adoption.</p>
<p>If only the USA was so advanced. The situation shows that criminals are less criminal then religious zealots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-2/#comment-70935</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70935</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so sick of people spouting off like this.

&quot;Who cares what you think? Show me social science that backs up your position, or shut up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so sick of people spouting off like this.</p>
<p>&#8220;Who cares what you think? Show me social science that backs up your position, or shut up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewski</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-2/#comment-70839</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70839</guid>
		<description>Oz, Canada and the US are all Federal states.  In the US, two World Wars, a Civil War, the Depression, and a long legacy of discrimination have created a much greater concentration of power at Federal level.  Oz passed a Federal law prohibiting gays from marrying; Canadian gays gained the right to marry after challenges at the provincial level, all based on denial of rights under the Charter (constitution); in the US, DOMA blocks Federal recognition, but it doesn&#039;t block states from marrying gay couples.  Also, under US law, upholding DOMA creates an inevitable collision between keeping gays &quot;single&quot; and a large segment of our civil rights laws.  We have appellate layers in both state and federal courts that don&#039;t exist in Oz or Canada.  In the US, recognizing gay civil unions or domestic partnerships, especially at the Federal level (taxes, Social Security benefits, etc.) would create a very legitimate legal problem--those are benefits of marriage, and creating new gay-only institutions creates a new bureaucracy.  If a civil union is not marriage, then why should the state or any private company recognize it?  We&#039;ve already seen (in Connecticut and New Jersey, for two states) that even state laws don&#039;t necessarily enforce the legitimacy of state legislation (civil union/ DP).  

Of course, this all started as a discussion on gays and adoption.  Not really an issue in Canada, and it wasn&#039;t at the time marriage was expanded to gays.  Clearly it is an issue in Oz.  In the European countries that were early to move on civil unions or marriage, most had to come back and revisit the issue of adoption.  In the US, there is no Federal law on this, but the right-wingers have used the issue as a weapon at the state level.  It was easier for gays to adopt when DOMA was passed than it is now.  Florida is just one state barring gays from adopting, yet it alone is almost equal in population to Australia.  Ohio&#039;s laws against gay marriage are at least as vengeful as Florida&#039;s, but Ohio law doesn&#039;t bar gays from adopting.  

Canada has put almost all these issues to rest.  Oz is further along than the US, but it should be noted that both Oz and Canada concentrate far more of their population in far fewer cities.  In the US, we have more people who have more room to be ignorant fools, but that doesn&#039;t mean we come close to having a monopoly on discrimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oz, Canada and the US are all Federal states.  In the US, two World Wars, a Civil War, the Depression, and a long legacy of discrimination have created a much greater concentration of power at Federal level.  Oz passed a Federal law prohibiting gays from marrying; Canadian gays gained the right to marry after challenges at the provincial level, all based on denial of rights under the Charter (constitution); in the US, DOMA blocks Federal recognition, but it doesn&#8217;t block states from marrying gay couples.  Also, under US law, upholding DOMA creates an inevitable collision between keeping gays &#8220;single&#8221; and a large segment of our civil rights laws.  We have appellate layers in both state and federal courts that don&#8217;t exist in Oz or Canada.  In the US, recognizing gay civil unions or domestic partnerships, especially at the Federal level (taxes, Social Security benefits, etc.) would create a very legitimate legal problem&#8211;those are benefits of marriage, and creating new gay-only institutions creates a new bureaucracy.  If a civil union is not marriage, then why should the state or any private company recognize it?  We&#8217;ve already seen (in Connecticut and New Jersey, for two states) that even state laws don&#8217;t necessarily enforce the legitimacy of state legislation (civil union/ DP).  </p>
<p>Of course, this all started as a discussion on gays and adoption.  Not really an issue in Canada, and it wasn&#8217;t at the time marriage was expanded to gays.  Clearly it is an issue in Oz.  In the European countries that were early to move on civil unions or marriage, most had to come back and revisit the issue of adoption.  In the US, there is no Federal law on this, but the right-wingers have used the issue as a weapon at the state level.  It was easier for gays to adopt when DOMA was passed than it is now.  Florida is just one state barring gays from adopting, yet it alone is almost equal in population to Australia.  Ohio&#8217;s laws against gay marriage are at least as vengeful as Florida&#8217;s, but Ohio law doesn&#8217;t bar gays from adopting.  </p>
<p>Canada has put almost all these issues to rest.  Oz is further along than the US, but it should be noted that both Oz and Canada concentrate far more of their population in far fewer cities.  In the US, we have more people who have more room to be ignorant fools, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we come close to having a monopoly on discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Adkins</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-2/#comment-70835</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70835</guid>
		<description>Budbub: you are a VERY uninformed person!  People reading your comments should be aware that the &quot;Australia-as-a-dumping-ground-for-British-criminals&quot; finished in the early 1800&#039;s.

Homosexuality is segal and diversity celebrated in all Australian states and territories.  Legal frameworks have undertaken dramatic law reform nationally under the current national government and social change has taken place in a similar fashion via each of the progressive state governments.

One of the last bastions for equality reform is the issue of same-gender relationship recognition.  Currently our Australian G&amp;L community is internally divided over the need or otherwise to use the work &quot;marriage&quot; just as the devoutly religious are laying claim to  this language.  One clear uniting point amongst a vast majority of Australians (some surveys suggest 80%!) is the need for equality in the rights that recognition of relationships provide to the participants in the union, regardless of gender.

I hope one day that the USA will embrace similar progressive attitudes in each State of the Union.  Maybe Budbub should get out a bit more and smell the roses.

Hi to you all from a progressive and bloody cold (sorry for the Aussie slang Budbub) Melbourne!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Budbub: you are a VERY uninformed person!  People reading your comments should be aware that the &#8220;Australia-as-a-dumping-ground-for-British-criminals&#8221; finished in the early 1800&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Homosexuality is segal and diversity celebrated in all Australian states and territories.  Legal frameworks have undertaken dramatic law reform nationally under the current national government and social change has taken place in a similar fashion via each of the progressive state governments.</p>
<p>One of the last bastions for equality reform is the issue of same-gender relationship recognition.  Currently our Australian G&amp;L community is internally divided over the need or otherwise to use the work &#8220;marriage&#8221; just as the devoutly religious are laying claim to  this language.  One clear uniting point amongst a vast majority of Australians (some surveys suggest 80%!) is the need for equality in the rights that recognition of relationships provide to the participants in the union, regardless of gender.</p>
<p>I hope one day that the USA will embrace similar progressive attitudes in each State of the Union.  Maybe Budbub should get out a bit more and smell the roses.</p>
<p>Hi to you all from a progressive and bloody cold (sorry for the Aussie slang Budbub) Melbourne!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdw021</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-2/#comment-70810</link>
		<dc:creator>mdw021</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70810</guid>
		<description>There are wack-jobs everywhere.  The comments of some contributors stating how heinous Oz is because of this bigot would be similar to someone judging the US based on the multiple crazies like Sally Kerns....PLEASE...we all have our bigots, haters, histories...OZ is a perfect example of how you can&#039;t just ship them off to an island and forget about them :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are wack-jobs everywhere.  The comments of some contributors stating how heinous Oz is because of this bigot would be similar to someone judging the US based on the multiple crazies like Sally Kerns&#8230;.PLEASE&#8230;we all have our bigots, haters, histories&#8230;OZ is a perfect example of how you can&#8217;t just ship them off to an island and forget about them <img src='http://www.365gay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-70806</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70806</guid>
		<description>Despite this crazy woman, Australia is still a relatively gay-friendly country especially in the capital cities and major towns. It is a case of the government still being behind the people on this social issue.

I&#039;m an openly gay teenager and in my daily life in the typically straight suburbs of working/middle class Sydney I get no problems whatsoever. People just don&#039;t care and if they do, they don&#039;t tend to vocalise their disapproval anyway.

You can&#039;t help but love Australia :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite this crazy woman, Australia is still a relatively gay-friendly country especially in the capital cities and major towns. It is a case of the government still being behind the people on this social issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an openly gay teenager and in my daily life in the typically straight suburbs of working/middle class Sydney I get no problems whatsoever. People just don&#8217;t care and if they do, they don&#8217;t tend to vocalise their disapproval anyway.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t help but love Australia <img src='http://www.365gay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcuspuer</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-70802</link>
		<dc:creator>arcuspuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70802</guid>
		<description>In Australia, most people have no qualms with gay people. The only TRUE prejudice i have encountered comes from the provincial areas. I say true prejudice because most people when confronted with homosexuality do not actually mind. 

oh and fyi budbud. Most people I know are scared of American prejudice rather than any prejudice we encounter here. 

you are WAY off base!

I love Australia because of its multiculturism and acceptance. 

America frightens me because of its fanaticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Australia, most people have no qualms with gay people. The only TRUE prejudice i have encountered comes from the provincial areas. I say true prejudice because most people when confronted with homosexuality do not actually mind. </p>
<p>oh and fyi budbud. Most people I know are scared of American prejudice rather than any prejudice we encounter here. </p>
<p>you are WAY off base!</p>
<p>I love Australia because of its multiculturism and acceptance. </p>
<p>America frightens me because of its fanaticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-70799</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70799</guid>
		<description>I am proud to belong to the liberal branch of the Episcopal church that is increasingly treating women and gay people as equals. My own church has been under the guidance of a pro-gay female rector and now a pro-gay interum female rector. And our church has put out a profile of itself as very diverse. And happily acknowledges that our sort of place would be a total mismatch for and of no interest to someone who is a conservative candidate looking to be rector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am proud to belong to the liberal branch of the Episcopal church that is increasingly treating women and gay people as equals. My own church has been under the guidance of a pro-gay female rector and now a pro-gay interum female rector. And our church has put out a profile of itself as very diverse. And happily acknowledges that our sort of place would be a total mismatch for and of no interest to someone who is a conservative candidate looking to be rector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveMD2</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-70788</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveMD2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70788</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately,  being a bigoted bitch (male or female) seems to be quite normal.

Religion has to a significant extent been perverted from &quot;Love thy Neighbor as thyself&quot;, which Jesus said was the only commandment (other then to love God) to &quot;Love thyself, to hell with your neighbor.

Bishop Spong of Canada pointed out a few years ago that religion has become, in my transliterated words,  a refuge from the confusion and complications of everyday life.  It provides a rules based, frozen in a time warp, comfort zone for so many people.  And that prevents any change in their mentality.  Example would be I think it was not until 1962, 17 years after the horrors of the Holocaust became widely known, that the Catholic Church, in Vatican II in a mealy mouthed way, removed their official positions which denigrated Jews.  And believe it or not, my very orthodox Roman Catholic friend, with whom I debate fiercely, said the his church is splitting.  Prob thanks to the Pope, who is about 81 yrs old, but mentally is living in the 10th century.

There are opportunities here to capture Good catholic people to the cause, though the real barrier will be the word marriage, vs a CU or equiv.  Rome wasn&#039;t built in a day, and ingrained attitudes frozen in this time warp by the church&#039;s super-gluing of the mind (brainwashint) will continue to be a problem.  BTW, surveys say 50% of Catholics under 30 support gay MARRIAGE.  I volunteer with a number of them at HRC.

KEep working at it.  Don&#039;t let the intimidation and losses get you down. 

This is why so many religions are frozen, and it takes  a long time to move them forward.  But we are making progress.  From 2003 to 2009, in 6 years, after the seminal event of the appointment of a Gay Bishop - Gene Robinson, that church, always considered moderately conservative, has become very progressive.  3 new asst. Bishops are expected to be appointed who are gay.  An official &quot;marriage ceremony&quot; - maybe a &quot;committment ceremony wordwise&quot;, is being worked on at the national level, and BTW, back in 2004 I attended a gay commitment ceremony in DC. Absolutely a marriage in all but name, but unfortunately no legal value then.

Sure, the old fogies will break away, good riddance to them.  The divide is very much age group related.  The Evan Lutherans may well do the same thing this month, the PresbyterianUSA didn&#039;t make it at their convention last month, but came much much closer then a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately,  being a bigoted bitch (male or female) seems to be quite normal.</p>
<p>Religion has to a significant extent been perverted from &#8220;Love thy Neighbor as thyself&#8221;, which Jesus said was the only commandment (other then to love God) to &#8220;Love thyself, to hell with your neighbor.</p>
<p>Bishop Spong of Canada pointed out a few years ago that religion has become, in my transliterated words,  a refuge from the confusion and complications of everyday life.  It provides a rules based, frozen in a time warp, comfort zone for so many people.  And that prevents any change in their mentality.  Example would be I think it was not until 1962, 17 years after the horrors of the Holocaust became widely known, that the Catholic Church, in Vatican II in a mealy mouthed way, removed their official positions which denigrated Jews.  And believe it or not, my very orthodox Roman Catholic friend, with whom I debate fiercely, said the his church is splitting.  Prob thanks to the Pope, who is about 81 yrs old, but mentally is living in the 10th century.</p>
<p>There are opportunities here to capture Good catholic people to the cause, though the real barrier will be the word marriage, vs a CU or equiv.  Rome wasn&#8217;t built in a day, and ingrained attitudes frozen in this time warp by the church&#8217;s super-gluing of the mind (brainwashint) will continue to be a problem.  BTW, surveys say 50% of Catholics under 30 support gay MARRIAGE.  I volunteer with a number of them at HRC.</p>
<p>KEep working at it.  Don&#8217;t let the intimidation and losses get you down. </p>
<p>This is why so many religions are frozen, and it takes  a long time to move them forward.  But we are making progress.  From 2003 to 2009, in 6 years, after the seminal event of the appointment of a Gay Bishop &#8211; Gene Robinson, that church, always considered moderately conservative, has become very progressive.  3 new asst. Bishops are expected to be appointed who are gay.  An official &#8220;marriage ceremony&#8221; &#8211; maybe a &#8220;committment ceremony wordwise&#8221;, is being worked on at the national level, and BTW, back in 2004 I attended a gay commitment ceremony in DC. Absolutely a marriage in all but name, but unfortunately no legal value then.</p>
<p>Sure, the old fogies will break away, good riddance to them.  The divide is very much age group related.  The Evan Lutherans may well do the same thing this month, the PresbyterianUSA didn&#8217;t make it at their convention last month, but came much much closer then a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewski</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/australian-mp-opposes-same-sex-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-70786</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9003#comment-70786</guid>
		<description>Oh--forgot to ask.  Has Dorothy Pratt reproduced yet?  If not, there&#039;s still time to request that she not, in the interests of the Australian people.  If she has, her kids should be encouraged to apply for whatever compensation fund there is for children of unstable parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8211;forgot to ask.  Has Dorothy Pratt reproduced yet?  If not, there&#8217;s still time to request that she not, in the interests of the Australian people.  If she has, her kids should be encouraged to apply for whatever compensation fund there is for children of unstable parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
