Comments on: Anti-domestic partner referendum makes ballot

By: Matthew Simonds

Matthew Simonds — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:26:50 +0000

God I hope this dose not get on the ballot, now the court case is onto Thurston county (as apparently that’s the only county it can be filed and heard in.) where one can hope Sam Reed will get a nice big tongue lashing and that the referendum will be thrown out.

By: secrity

secrity — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:07:36 +0000

I am against domestic partnerships too, they officially give gay relationships second class status.

By: Jacquemar

Jacquemar — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:46:08 +0000

LOL @ fwilms!

I agree, that’s the way these people are behaving.

By: fwilms

fwilms — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:24:54 +0000

Let’s vote to allow slavery. Let’s vote to remove Freedom of Religion for Mormons. How about disallowing divorce–and annulling marriages that do not produce children in 3 years.

By: rogerma

rogerma — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:11:07 +0000

Again, making law through referendum instead of where it belongs, in the legislature. If it doesn’t pass, will they take it to court? If it doesn’t pass the courts, will they begin another referendum? Or will they try and take control of the legislature and simply pass anti-gay legislation? Will the governor veto it? Will they then accept the legislatures vote, or will they just access their, modular self-seeding (collected from their mailing lists)right-wing donaters, and start a new referendum? And they advertise there’s no gay discrimination!

By: michaelnDallas

michaelnDallas — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:08:27 +0000

we need to counter with legislation to require spouses to prove marital status before simply granting visitation and other hospital rights. Let heterosexuals, experience the frustration of having to carry proof of their marriage with them, proof of the parentage of children. Since all an opposite sex person needs say is they are a spouse to someone in the hospital to gain access.

By: Amarie

Amarie — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:28:58 +0000

At least this campaign exposes the lie that they support giving us the rights and responsibilities of marriage, but want us to simply call it something else.

By: jlachett

jlachett — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:43:34 +0000

Prop 8 II: the sequel