November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Clinton says election isn’t about her


(Denver, Colorado) Hillary Rodham Clinton had a simple message Tuesday for her still loyal supporters: This election isn’t about her.

The former first lady ceded the nomination that was almost hers in a prime-time speech to Democratic delegates, closing another chapter in a long, improbable political career that took her from supportive spouse to political powerhouse.

She was warmly embraced by delegates split between herself and Barack Obama in the primary. Any who were still angry over her loss were drowned out in applause when she opened her speech by declaring herself “a proud supporter of Barack Obama.”

She exhorted her backers – “my sisterhood of the traveling pantsuits,” she called them – to remember who was most important in this campaign.

“I want you to ask yourselves: Were you in this campaign just for me?” she said. She urged them instead to remember Marines who have served their country, single mothers, families barely getting by on minimum wage and other struggling Americans.

“You haven’t worked so hard over the last 18 months, or endured the last eight years, to suffer through more failed leadership,” Clinton told the delegates. “No way. No how. No McCain.”

The line drew applause from Obama, who was watching on television from Billings, Mont., with supporters and reporters.

Clinton spoke on the eve of the delegate roll call in which both she and Obama will be nominated for president. But under a deal between the two camps, only some delegates will get the opportunity to cast a historic vote for either a woman or a black man before the split decision will be cut off in favor of unanimous consent for Obama.

Advisers to Clinton and Obama sent a joint letter Tuesday night instructing state delegation chairs to distribute vote tally sheets to delegates Wednesday and return them by 4 p.m. local time, just as the vote is scheduled to get under way.

The letter said Clinton would have one nominating speech and two seconding speeches, followed by Obama’s nominating speech and three seconding speeches – totaling no more than 15 minutes for each candidate. Then the roll call will begin, said the letter signed by Obama senior adviser Jeff Berman, Clinton senior adviser Craig Smith and convention secretary Alice Germond.

Still, many details were unclear – which states would get a chance to vote, whether Clinton herself would cut it off in acclamation for Obama and if floor demonstrations would be tolerated.

The dealmaking and lack of direction left Clinton supporters frustrated. Clinton fueled confusion by refusing to publicly instruct her delegates how to vote, though she said she’ll back Obama when the time comes. She planned to meet with her delegates Wednesday.

All the Clintons, a longtime royal family of Democratic politics, were on hand to pass the torch to Obama. Clinton was introduced by her daughter Chelsea, while her husband watched from a box seat above the Arkansas delegation. Not everyone with a ticket could get in to hear Clinton after fire marshals declared the hall filled to capacity.

The convention hall was brimming with delegates wearing Clinton gear. There were Hillary T-shirts, buttons and stickers. Some delegates brought signs promoting Clinton for president. Many wore white shirts to mark the 88th anniversary of women’s suffrage.

“My mother was born before women could vote,” Clinton reminded them. “But in this election my daughter got to vote for her mother for president.”

The Obama campaign gave Clinton her due. Before she took the stage Tuesday night, Obama’s campaign distributed “Hillary” signs throughout the Pepsi Center. But only sentences into Clinton’s speech, those signs were quickly swapped out for others proclaiming either “Obama” or “Hillary” on one side, and “Unity” on the other.

Some Clinton delegates weren’t ready for so quick a pivot.

“We love you Hillary!” some shouted.

Jennie Lou Leeder, a Clinton delegate from Llado, Texas, said Clinton “was so good tonight, I was crying.”

Did her speech help to unify the party?

“It’s not Hillary’s job to bring this party together,” Leeder said. “It’s Barack Obama’s job to bring this party together.”

Daniel Kagan, a Clinton delegate from Englewood, Colo., said he felt pride and sadness watching Clinton speak. He was proud of her accomplishments, but saddened by the realization that her campaign was truly over.

Nevertheless, Kagan said, the speech will help to unify the party.

“I know that it’s changed attitudes,” Kagan said. “I saw some of my colleagues standing up and applauding for Obama for the first time.”

It was the culmination of an emotional day for Clinton loyalists, still wondering how the final act would play out in Wednesday’s roll call vote and whether they would have a chance to give their candidate one last show of support.

Party leaders said they feared a nationally televised floor demonstration Wednesday that would underscore party divisions.

“It seems to be a little more of a problem than I anticipated,” former Democratic Party chairman Don Fowler told the AP. “All you need is 200 people in that crowd to boo and stuff like that and it will be replayed 900 times. And that’s not what you want out of this.”


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Gerry Fisher Said: August 28th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
    • As an Obama supporter, I thought Hillary hit a home run with her speech. I’ve never seen her give a better speech, and it was done under tremendous pressure with huge consequences. I agree with those who point out that it’s Obama’s responsibility to pick it up from here. Of course, it would be great if she could help out here and there…but it’s not her responsibility.

      As for third-party candidates, give me a break. Until these parties do the hard work of building up true, nation-wide organizations, then electing their candidates to the presidency would, in effect, create a powerless figure head who’d be dominated by the two-party led Congress.

      The Green party, IMO, is doing it right and is making progress. You can see their elected officials sprinkled across the state legislatures. It’s a good start. But, until they build up a true political base, they will continue to be vulnerable to ego-maniacal, individualistic opportunists like Nader and Barr who are too lazy to get vetted the more intense processes of true, deep, national parties. (At least the R and D egomaniacs have to get vetted. ;-) ) I can’t help but to think that Nader and Barr are, to a huge extent, circumventing hard work. (And Barr is not a friend to the gay community, no matter what he says. Author of DOMA! He likes us now because he NEEDS us.)

  • Censoredagain Said: August 27th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
    • Karen said “…We’ll do it because he’s better than the other guy….”

      There are more people running then McCain and Obama. We as a nation will continue to suffer from the duopoly of the freedom foiling Theocatic Republicans and the individual liberty hating Socialist Democrats so long as we continue to dismiss the voices of the minority parties. We will continue the self fulfilling prophecy of minority parties loosing if we never vote from in the first place.

  • The Other Karen Said: August 27th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
    • I agree that it is unfair to put the responsibility on Hillary to win the election for Obama. If he really wanted her supporters, why not make her the VP nominee? Once again, the woman is supposed to work hard, then step back and give all the glory to the man. LOrian even wants her to work twice as hard. That’s pitiful. If he wants my vote, HE should work for it.

  • Karen Said: August 27th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
    • LOrion, you must be kidding. Why is it Hillary’s job to win this election for Obama? You talk as though she has the power to singlehandedly make or break his campaign, to singlehandedly unify the Democratic part, but yet she’s not good enough to be on the ticket. Hmm…. I doubt that any true Democrat will vote for McCain. Don’t be fooled by all these Repubs making those posts, trying to fuel division. We’ll vote for Obama, but reluctantly. And we won’t do it because he’s inspired us or touched us. We won’t do it because we believe he’s the great savior. We won’t even do it because Hillary told us to. We’ll do it because he’s better than the other guy. But I am beginning to doubt I can ever be convinced that he’s better than her.

  • Censoredagain Said: August 27th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
    • Well I invite all those dems that are not happy with Obama and planing on voting on McCain to rethink voting for McInsane and vote for Bob Barr.

  • Matt Said: August 27th, 2008 at 11:42 am
    • She got a deal from Obama. Once he’s elected she’ll be on the Supreme Court.

  • Trace Said: August 27th, 2008 at 10:59 am
    • As I see it, Hillary has nothing to PROVE LOrion.

      The Obama camp had better start showing some serious appreciation and gratitude towards the Senator from New York or she could become his worst nightmare. (P.S. – Sending out text messages at 3am to get your digs in is not a start.)

  • LOrion Said: August 27th, 2008 at 10:40 am
    • Well she better get out there and PROVE it. She needs to make twice as many campaign stops as OBAMA…tell everyone what she as a SENATOR will gain from and OBAMA presidency. and doggedly follow all the McCain DIVIDE DIVIDE DIVIDE The Repugs will continue to USE HER…unless she says NO…day after day after day until NOVEMBER.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook