Comments on: Democrats Told To Include Gay Issues In Platform

By: RANDY

RANDY — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:58:10 +0000

Why are gays supporting Obama the Messiah? Like all his politics, he just told you what you wanted to hear? But right after he told you what you wanted to hear, he told Newsomes people, “I can’t have my photograph taken with you… a gay mayor”
Dont fall fo the kool aid, at least McCain will stay out of your way and let you fight in the states.
1995, Obama said, he needs to save himself by paying back the black people off the backs of the white people. I think we knwo what this fake is all about, HIMSELF!

By: Ed Gould

Ed Gould — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:15:42 +0000

It is clear to me that Obama will (if elected) be the worse choice since Bill Clinton for Gay People. He has already sanctioned giving US money to churches. He has shown in the past that he really dislikes gay people by continuing to attend a church who spouts hate from the pulpit. If he had any back bone what so ever he would have resigned from the church. Instead he continued to listen and has indicated now he is for “Faith Based Initiatives” which is nothing more than Giveaways from the US government to churches (like his) that spout hate.

By: Ron

Ron — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:57:58 +0000

The United States Constitution is not a religious document, therefore adding a marriage amendment is unconstitutional. Read the first amendment! No U.S. government has the leagl authority to regulate marriage. Marriage has been turned into a religious institution and then highjacked by U.S. governments which is basicly religious rule. I still cannot support the democratic party even if they say they will pass all kinds of gay friendly laws because their goal is and has been to remove our constitutional freedoms. The republicans also wish to remove our freedoms but in different ways. “We the people” live under a dictatorship by our own choosing by our constant voting to keep the same law makers in our government for years.