Life on the Hill: Frank’s new aide settles into job

Diego Miguel Sanchez is no stranger to Capitol Hill.
He’s lobbied.
He’s testified.
And now he’s working on the Hill, a new member of U.S. Rep. Barney Frank’s team in The Rayburn House Office Building. His title, which Sanchez believes will fit on a business card, is “legislative assistant for LGBT, healthcare, labor, veterans, census and Social Security issues.
“It’s really exciting to be able to do during the day the work that I did as a volunteer, and it is an honor to serve Congressman Frank,” said Sanchez, who holds the distinction of being the first openly transgender congressional aide.
Sanchez said his appointment gives him hope for equal employment opportunities for all.
“To me it seems like a window is cracked open and there is some air coming through,” Sanchez said.
At the time of his interview with 365gay.com, Sanchez still was settling into life in Washington, D.C. — looking for a permanent place to live, awaiting the ethics training required of congressional staff, and anticipating receipt of a much-needed and definitely-desired Blackberry to take care of business as business develops.
“It was hit the ground running,” Sanchez said of his first days on the job. “And it’s a blessing to be able to do this job.”
His desk is organized for business with stacks of papers — letters to constituents to review to make sure their queries are answered, stacks of bills to review to decide whether to recommend Frank’s co-sponsorship.
His calendar, less than two weeks into the job, is full of appointments kept and meetings to make.
“I didn’t know what went into the day until it became my day,” Sanchez of the legislative aide’s typical workday on the Hill.
He begins the day reading newspapers — The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Boston Globe.
“After I do that, I come to work,” Sanchez said.
His first task at the office is more reading. He checks Frank’s Internet homepage and that of the Library of Congress. He reviews other congressional Web sites, as well as Roll Call and thehill.com.
“You’ve got to make sure you know what’s going on,” Sanchez said.
He then checks his voicemail and e-mail and then his calendar, which might involve meeting with other congressional aides, constituents and representatives from any number of organizations.
On a recent Thursday, Sanchez’s meetings included discussing the 2009 legislative agenda with the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the Anti-Defamation League and discussing healthcare with representatives from the American Psychological Association.
Working to move hate crimes legislation and an employment non-discrimination bill are priorities for Sanchez, as well as enacting healthcare reform.
“Most important for me is making sure I give Congressman Frank proper proposals, making sure what we are proposing benefits the constituents,” he said. “Healthcare is top drawer.”
Sanchez met Frank about 18 years ago at a banquet in Boston.
That night, the representative from Massachusetts said he believed there would be a time to pursue an employment non-discrimination bill that included gender identity, but he felt “this is not that time.”
Sanchez said he appreciated Frank’s honesty.
Now is the time.
Frank is “at a place where he wants to have full inclusion,” Sanchez said.
Prior to going to joining Frank’s team, Sanchez worked with AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts and AIDS Action Council. He also worked in the hotel industry, employment that brought him to Massachusetts in 1991.
Sanchez also lived in Augusta, Ga., where his mother still lives, and describes his childhood as that of an “Army brat.”
In his congressional testimony urging passage of an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act, Sanchez described a complicated childhood made comfortable by supportive parents.
“When I was 5, I told my parents that I was born wrong, that I felt like a boy inside,” Sanchez testified last summer. “My mother showed me a magazine with Christine Jorgensen on the cover. She told me that she didn’t know if there were other people like me — girls who felt like boys — but that this woman was born a boy, felt like a girl and was able to become a woman later in life. Mom told me that by the time I grew up, it would be OK. From that time, my parents gently, privately, dually socialized me, but it was our secret, of sorts.”
He continued, “Mom was mostly right; it’s almost OK for me these days.”
With humor, Sanchez testified, “I am the only male Georgia letterman I know of who earned it on the women’s tennis team.”
His life experience, plus his work experience, made Sanchez an ideal candidate for the legislative post in Frank’s office.
“Barney was thrilled to see my experience and the background I had working with veterans organizations, on labor, in corporations,” Sanchez said. “He said he liked the blend of things.”
Considering the new year and the arrival of a new administration to work with a new Congress, the new legislative aide on Capitol Hill said he expected a lot of progress.
“More for equality. More for health coverage. More protections, more inclusion, for more people,” Sanchez said.





Step, break open a history book. Without trannies, there would have been no Stonewall riot. How far along do you think you’d be now without that?
Chris, there was no hope of Bush signing ENDA, with or without transgender inclusion. Congressman Frank sold the trans community down the river for a simple majority vote in the House only, with NO POSSIBILITY of a 2/3 override on a veto, or even a floor vote in the Senate. I’m grateful for all the work he’s done over the years, but he definitely failed the trans community on that one.
This is one of the worst decisions in our history. We haven’t ESTABLISHED rights for gays at the federal level so why bring a tranny into it? I’m so tired of trans being grouped with gay/lesbian/bi.
JK – teh article is NOT about HRC, it IS about Barney Frank. Stay on topic. Yes, obviously he removed trans protections from the bill, that was the whole issue -you are not shedding any new light here. This was done because he felt it would help its chances to pass and then add trans protections later. His thinking was that it was better to pass an ENDA w/o trans protections and then add them than to have EVERYONE without some benefit. That was the entire point of the controversy. It was an unfortunate reality he had to deal with, people who were not willing to vote to pass it WITH trans protections but who would have voted for it NOW w/o them. Nobody is saying that this is a pleasant dynamic, but adopting an “if I can’t have it, neither can you” isn’t helping anyone either. I would be careful about telling people that they don’t know what they are talking about when they damn well do know VERY WELL what they are talkng about – you only make yourself seem ignorant of the facts. …and “Chris” what you say is simply not true. “Tedd” your comments also have nothing to do with the issue in this article. It’s easy to sit back and pontificate, getting some DONE is quite another matter. Barney Frank has my full support.
My high regard for Representative Frank has plummeted. When I approached his office about the usurious interest rates that one of the largest banks in the U.S. were beginning to charge their long-term credit card customers (this was also one of the banks that received bailout billions), I did not even receive a response to my inquiry. I guess he is (was) too busy becoming the new media darling or his staff really dropped the ball. In any case, Barney has become yet another hot winded, long winded politician.
Chris, an ENDA bill without protections for gender identity is pretty worthless anyway. It would allow employers to fire gay people for not adhering to gender stereotypes, thus putting men who aren’t macho enough and women who are “too butch” at risk. Typically, that’s why gay people (or people perceived as gay) are fired anyway.
ps., I meant to say “surely there have been no ‘un-openly transgedner’ Congressional aides.” Hopefully the day will come when we are no longer the only group of people who treat our identities, and have them treated by others, as something to be revealed or hidden as one might an ugly wart. Of course I know many LGBT people must be cautious, especially the young, but by the time someone is identified as LGBT in a news report, the ‘openly’ is moot and we do ourselves a disservice by perpetuating it.
Oh, Yeah, and
“and thought it pragmatic to attempt to it the way it was and then to add trans protections when the time was better”
He REMOVED us from the bill we were ALREADY in Chris. Them’s the facts
Chris,
I’m sorry but you are wrong on this one. You don’t know what the hell you are talking about.
HRC has said for 15 years, while taking money from us to pass an inclusive law, that they would never leave us behind.
Elizabeth Birch did in the mid 90’s, some one else around 2000 and Joe S. did last year. Third time’s the fracking charm.
We have been lied to for a decade and a half while you people have used us, our families and our lives as a bargening chip. How the hell do you think this makes us feel towards people like you that try to tell us it’s all in our heads and were twisting facts? These ARE the facts. That is why almost EVERY GLBT org. raillied against Franks approch to this!
Would you like it done to you Chris? How would you react? How the hell would you feel?
This is very exciting for transgender people and queers everywhere. Congratulations Diego Miguel Sanchez. Work hard on those issues for us; and hey, having a transperson on Capitol Hill probably can’t hurt the passage of an all inclusive ENDA.
http://stuffqueerpeopleneedtoknow.wordpress.com/
OMG, now it’s ‘the first openly transgendered’ Congressional aide? The term ‘openly gay’ is bad enough, but surely there have been no ‘un-openly gay’ Congressional aides. Ever. Can we please drop this unneccesary, internalized-homphobic qualifier? We are either gay or closeted, there is no such thing as ‘openly gay.’ Any openly Jewish people out there? How about some openly Christian folk? Openly straight people? It’s time to drop this. Being gay or transgendered is not a disease only our doctor knows about, nor a crime to be confessed. If you’re calling someone gay or transgendered in the media there is no point whatever in adding ‘openly.’ It smells of self-loathing.
Rachel – There is nothing “spiteful” in my comemnts as you so melodramatically imply. Barney Frank has been at this game a loooong time and knows full well what can and cannot pass or at least stands a shot at it. It may not suit your personal motivations to believe otherwise, but I have no doubt that Mr. Frank did what he felt was most pragmzatic at the time.
Well stated JK. It may not have stung quite so bad if there was even the slightest chance the bill would become law. It wasn’t going to pass the Senate and Bush would have vetoed it in an instant. It was a tactical blunder to cause such division in the GLBT community for a bill that was dead on arrival anyway. What was the point? It’s also sad to read the spiteful comments by people like Chris. History shows, the oppressed are often first in line to stomp on someone else.
What a great PFLAG mom Mr. Sanchez has! My wish is that all of our trans youth could experience the same unconditional love and support that he had.
Dawn Holt
PFLAG Portland Oregon
JK – not at all true, but indicative of the tunnel vision many have in the GLBT community. Barney Frank was convinced that there were not enough votes to pass an inclusive ENDA and thought it pragmatic to attempt to it the way it was and then to add trans protections when the time was better for that to pass as well. It didn’t work out in the end, but was obviously not the malicious gesture that you have self-servingly describe in your post.
I sure hope Frank tries to pass an inclusive ENDA as he was the leader in throwing us under the bus to pass the non-inclusive ENDA. Of course Barny said that he would not drop us then and like the scumbag he can be did so for a bill that would never ever become law under Bush. Knowing himself that the law would never pass he should of included everyone as a sign of unity with in the GLBTIQ world but he decided to just toss us under the bus like were disposable.