November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: Living

NBC’s Bob Costas Discusses Gays in Sports

, AfterElton.com



Photo credit: Greg Trott/Getty Images

AE: The consequences being…?

BC:
Either that the player is ostracized or that somebody tries to hurt them, whatever that might be. There’s a pretty powerful culture at work within clubhouses and locker rooms in male team sports.

AE: A pretty powerful culture of…?

BC:
Of hyper-heterosexuality.

AE: Despite the fact that clearly there are many gay athletes.

BC:
Yes. How many, I don’t know. But obviously many, many.

The other thing that I’ve always felt about this is, I’m sympathetic to a gay athlete in this circumstance: While it shouldn’t matter what someone’s sexuality is as long as they conduct themselves as a responsible human being, we know that in 2008 and up until now, if someone declares themselves gay, their sexuality would be become an issue even among those who think of themselves as sympathetic. It would tend to be noted more, and be more front and center than for the heterosexual person who doesn’t have to proclaim that they’re heterosexual because that’s expected to be the case.

So the heterosexual person’s sexuality, generally speaking, becomes just a part of a larger persona. Whereas the gay person’s sexuality becomes a definition.

AE: Does that necessarily have to be true?

BC:
Doesn’t have to be true, and it shouldn’t be true. But you could understand that somebody who is trying to compete and hold onto their job – and most athletes are not superstars – there’s a lot of different pressures. They don’t want to have to deal with the additional celebrity baggage or the additional baggage of scrutiny that such a thing would bring to them. And on that level – I sympathize with them.

AE: Now have you heard this from gay athletes, behind the scenes off the record?

BC:
Yeah, once or twice I have. But I also just infer that.

AE: But do you feel that that is an inaccurate assumption? I look at people who come out, and it almost always opens up and relaxes the person more so they’re able to be more themselves. And people – the media, the audience, the fans – take their cue from that person as to how much a part of their life that is.

BC:
And I think you are correct. But that doesn’t invalidate the observation that a number of people might feel this way. Those who have come out that I’m aware of that were in team sports, all did it on their own timetable, when they felt comfortable, when they felt able to deal with it…

AE: After they were out of the sport….

BC:
Almost always after they were out of the sport. So your premise hasn’t been tested in a team sport atmosphere by an active player that I’m aware of.

AE: What kind of a player do you think it’s going to take to do that?

BC:
I don’t think it necessarily takes a star player. That was the premise of the Broadway show Take Me Out – it was a big star. That would be one interesting possibility. But another would be the guy’s just an average player. Just a guy on a team and maybe he gets traded or he’s waived or he’s picked up by somebody else. I think more so than his standing as a player, it would just take a person of guts and commitment to do it.

Retired NBC player John Amaechi

AE: Of the three team sports, I think the one you love the most is baseball. And doesn’t it seem to make sense that’s where maybe it would be easiest for someone to come out first?

BC:
Maybe. I mean the NBA’s leadership is generally very progressive. I think football would be the hardest because that’s the most hyper macho culture with its own mythologies attached to it. I’d be guessing as to whether the NBA or baseball would be most hospitable. There would be difficulties attached to it no matter what sport. But I think it would be most difficult in football.

AE: Has a gay athlete ever discussed with you the possibility of coming out?

BC:
Before he or she had?

AE: Or even if they then never did.

BC:
No.

AE: What do you think it will take in sports coverage for there to more coverage of this issue, and more comfort covering this issue?

BC:
I think we have to – especially those of us who see it as a valid issue and are sympathetic – I think we have to do more than what we have done. It’s a good topic. There are places that are good places to do it. HBO is a good place to do it. I don’t speak for them, but ESPN’s Outside the Lines which has done some stuff on this. The kind of magazine type shows that have the time and the format to treat it with some context and nuance and some real reporting. Those are the best places. And if the issue is hit harder in those places, maybe it will have some sort of trickle down effect.

Pages: 1 2 3

Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • RyGuy Said: September 21st, 2008 at 3:49 pm
    • Is this really news? Who cares…

  • trevor whitney-clarke Said: September 21st, 2008 at 3:38 am
    • why is it we continue to challenge the media on certain issues, it obvious that this athlete did have personal issues to overcome, and that he did and cam back to win gold..excellent…the community is always pushing for equality in every way, which is great but im sure that many of the other athletes probably also had personal issues to overcome, but we should not have to mention the details. i take my hat off to matthew, and wish him all the success in the future. we have to realise that the us media has always felt awkward about the whole gay issue in sports, its crap, but it is what it is..!

  • Bob Said: September 20th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
    • Where’s my barf bag? I read only the first page of the Costas ivu, and had enough of his bullshit. I couldn’t go on to another page. “Oh, gee, if only I’d thought to report facts . . .” “But other commentators should have thought to do so . . . What’s the matter with those guys?”

  • Will Said: September 18th, 2008 at 1:31 am
    • As mentioned.As remembered.As forgotten.

      No one remembers the USA company..had the balls to air a movie. A gay swimmer. Annoyingly aired by Mario L.

      As I don’t think NBC was trying to be bad.They just wanted to play safe. To favor neither side. Dammed if you do, damned if you don’t.

      Yes it be nice to know because such things are nailed, taped, blocked to be aired. Especially anything gay.And often if it is, it is negative that is only aired. No offense to this site, gay.com or other shows who continually do this.(TNT) Few shows have been positive, out about the people there airing.WE, and as the house, clothes, make over shows.But sure some can see the cliches traits in them.

  • Zeke Said: September 17th, 2008 at 10:30 pm
    • I can appreciate the point that is trying to be made in reference to what many feel NBC should’ve done with regard to Matthew Mitchum. Two things I will point out: 1. If they HAD mentioned is being gay, or referenced his partner, there’d be an outcry from gays and straights alike about “Why does it matter? Let him just dive!” 2. Watching Mitchum in the later dives as he gained ground and was coming closer and closer, you could tell by the way he expressed his excitement that he was gay. I’m thrilled as a gay man to see another gay man win an Olympic gold medal. But then, I’m thrilled when anyone, regardless of their sexuality, achieves greatness. Also, Costas’ comment about heterosexuality being part of a persona and homosexuality becoming one’s identity seems right on target. To me, in this instance, I would label Mitchum and Olympic athlete before labeling him gay. In this scenario, I just don’t think it amounts to much.

  • GayMan Said: September 17th, 2008 at 10:20 pm
    • You can’t change history. NBC as well as most major news outlets did not cover Matt Mitcham’s historic win. Back in 1936 Jesse Owens’ gold medal wins at the Berlin Olympics were major news stories. A parade in New York City was held in his honor and he recieved many endorsement deals. NBC knowingly omitted Matt’s story. For that I cannot forgive them.

  • Ron E Said: September 17th, 2008 at 9:49 pm
    • At the very least, you gotta give Costas credit for being willing to be so forthcoming.

  • Paul Mc Said: September 17th, 2008 at 7:47 am
    • I was so interested in Matthew’s performance and lucky enough to watch the whole 10m final live on BBC in the UK (who incidentally did not mention Matthew’s partner or sexuality either at that time). It was a hugely emotional moment for Matthew and for me and for any gay person. I was overwhelmed. I also thought that maybe one reason Matthew performed o well is precisely BECAUSE he was out. I noted that maybe there were other divers in the final not out who whose performance may have suffered due that fact and to the presence of an out gay man beside them!

  • Jim Said: September 16th, 2008 at 11:57 pm
    • You didn’t see the camera pan in on the Mitcham family of his boyfirend and mother, where normally you would hear “oh there’s his girlfriend, and mother” or some such other reference. Here you had a bona fide out gay sports hero, who would be a great role model for gay youth around the country, and no mention made. Why doesn’t Costas want to criticize his colleagues? or NBC? or himself? He says he guesses he was aware that Mitcham is out. Costas misses the boat, and we shortchanged again!

  • Kyle T. Said: September 16th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
    • I hate to say it, but Bob Costas left a very negative impression on me that has stayed to this day. It was in about 1990, and he had some kind of late-night (not sports-specific) interview program. He has interviewing one of the two men who portrayed the “Mens on Film” in the recurring skit on “In Living Color.” Many people, including me, considered (and still consider) that skit to be mocking, derisive, and harmful. The emotion behind it seemed to be contempt. (I was in a gay men’s rap group at the time, and you should have seen the pain in a c. 18 year old African American gay man’s eyes when the subject of that skit came up.) Anyway, Mr. Costas mentioned criticism of that skit, and was very sympathetic to the interviewee (Damon Wayans, I believe) and quite disrespectful of those who objected. It was like the two of them were allied in feeling self-righteous and proud of their homophobia, and defended their right to be homophobic and publicly express homophobia, while refusing to try any empathy or understanding relative to people who were complaining. I was very, very unfavorably impressed.

  • Doug loves you Said: September 16th, 2008 at 10:05 pm
    • Imentioned that Bob Costas would be a good choice to speak out on this story at the time it happened. You can read for yourselves my blog on Aug. 28 under the headline NBC talks about failure to mention. My stance is still the same. Maybe someone saw it and thought it would make a good article. I hope so. Peace

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook