<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

		


<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: The tidal shift in the LGBT movement</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-the-tidal-shift-in-the-lgbt-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-the-tidal-shift-in-the-lgbt-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnculhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Culhane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=24377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the change in military policy will lead to a change in national policy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who’s hiding now?</p>
<p>A couple of recent developments – one seismic, the other not so much – point to a tidal shift in the battle for LGBT equality and dignity.</p>
<p>The biggie, of course, is the(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-the-tidal-shift-in-the-lgbt-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: Fighting the wrong health insurance battle</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-fighting-the-wrong-health-insurance-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-fighting-the-wrong-health-insurance-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnculhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Culhane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=24089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do employers offer (much less pay for) health insurance in the first place?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I feel like we’re fighting the wrong battle – even when it’s a battle I myself have fought.</p>
<p>The issue of employer-provided health insurance for our partners was recently(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-fighting-the-wrong-health-insurance-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: Gay marriage victories breeding anti-gay desperation</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-gay-marriage-victories-breeding-anti-gay-desperation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-gay-marriage-victories-breeding-anti-gay-desperation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>johnculhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Culhane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=23994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher has lately been doubling down on her opposition, seeming increasingly disconnected from rationality or moderation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this never end?</p>
<p>That thought – unusual for me – popped into my head more than once during the past week, as I’ve been reading about a series of events and comments related to marriage(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-gay-marriage-victories-breeding-anti-gay-desperation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bigotry Watch: Maggie Gallagher needs to actually read the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/bigotry-watch-maggie-gallagher-needs-to-actually-read-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/bigotry-watch-maggie-gallagher-needs-to-actually-read-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Badash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=23192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gallagher and Sen. Grassley claim First Amendment rights are being "chilled" because there are fewer people who are saying what they want to hear.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie Gallagher, Chuck Grassley, heck, maybe all conservatives (including Sarah Palin!) and anti-equality fear-mongers need to actually <em>read</em> the First Amendment. I&#8217;m sure if <em>you&#8217;re</em> reading(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/bigotry-watch-maggie-gallagher-needs-to-actually-read-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: Gay Sports Teams and &#8220;Expressive Association&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-gay-sports-teams-and-expressive-association/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-gay-sports-teams-and-expressive-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Culhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boy Scouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should gay sports be allowed to limit straight participation? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have asked me this question:</p>
<p>Should a gay softball team be able to restrict the number of straight players on the squad?</p>
<p>The subject has been in the news recently, and not just in(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-gay-sports-teams-and-expressive-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: But are they &#8220;bigots&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-but-are-they-bigots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-but-are-they-bigots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Culhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Culhane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The religious opposition to marriage equality says that they are unjustly labeled as bigots, but are they really?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been much remarked lately that those who oppose marriage equality have been trying to stand the facts of the world on their heads. In a move that’s been at least partially successful,(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-but-are-they-bigots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: Analysis (and Celebration!) of the NY Marriage Equality Law</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-analysis-and-celebration-of-the-ny-marriage-equality-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-analysis-and-celebration-of-the-ny-marriage-equality-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Culhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay mariage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Culhane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the vote means - and the troubling religious exemptions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage equality is coming to New York! The bill was signed within about an hour of its passage through the legislature, and marriage licenses will start issuing in 30 days.</p>
<p>It’s hard to(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-analysis-and-celebration-of-the-ny-marriage-equality-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corvino: Farewell to readers</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/corvino-farewell-to-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/corvino-farewell-to-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Corvino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This column marks the end of my weekly contribution to 365gay.com. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This column marks the end of my weekly contribution to 365gay.com. It’s been a good run, and I want to take this opportunity to say thank you and farewell.</p>
<p>I’ve been a columnist since 2002,(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/corvino-farewell-to-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanasco: If new religious &#8216;carve outs&#8217; are too extreme, do not pass gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/vanasco-if-new-religious-carve-outs-are-too-extreme-do-not-pass-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/vanasco-if-new-religious-carve-outs-are-too-extreme-do-not-pass-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Know what would change the definition of marriage? Extreme religious exemptions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For three days, we have been waiting.</p>
<p>For three days, those who care about marriage equality in New York have waited, huddled outside of doors, as Republicans have conferenced, as they&#8217;ve met(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/vanasco-if-new-religious-carve-outs-are-too-extreme-do-not-pass-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corvino: Anti-marriage advocates have no case</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/corvino-anti-marriage-advocates-have-no-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/corvino-anti-marriage-advocates-have-no-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Corvino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have reached a point where our opponents have a really hard time publicly presenting arguments against us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York may be on the brink of extending marriage to same-sex couples. As of this writing, the state’s marriage-equality bill appears to be one vote shy of passage. Several state legislators(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/corvino-anti-marriage-advocates-have-no-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
		
