Now’s the time that they should be forced to answer for all the blood on their hands as a result of these harmful lies. I would love to send them a picture of all the (known) graves of suicides that have resulted from their lies over the decades.

Putting people in a position to believe that they can change something as core as their sexuality – and then not being able to do it – would be a pretty big blow to anyone. The fact that they knew they couldn’t and that it leads to such emotional turmoil should be considered criminal. They saw this, and LET IT CONTINUE!!!! Its like a religiously sanctioned Dr. Kevorkian mixed with old testament ideology.
But hey, what does the religious community care? As far as they’re concerned, it drove a bunch of gays to suicide, and is OK according to their beliefs. This was just a way for them to kill without getting their hands dirty.

What if it turns out that it has nothing to do with DNA, but like the fish in the Mississippi river being converted sexually by hormones in the water, then What? We already know that Alcohol crosses the placenta. Nicotine also crosses the placenta and we have baby pictures of a child in utero screaming from mom’s cigarette nicotine exposure- something you never hear about from the right-to-life-people. Both of these two chemicals majorly affect the way the brain is wired in a child.

Then there is a down winder case in Washington State, where the US Government exposed the civilian population to secret nuclear releases, which resulted in some of the civilian population losing their thyroid. In this case, I am aware of the mother had to stop using her thyroid medication because her child in utero took over what would be her normal thyroid operation. It also caused the subject to grow 3 inches, which is part of normal hormonal influences. Again in a round about way showing that hormones can affect both parties of pregnancy.

We know the California migrant workers have problems with second generational infertility, do to the pesticides messing with where the male urethra ends up on the male penis (not at the end were it belongs). It was reported back in the late 90’s in the AP wire that the cause was do to the pesticide acting as a hormone in both the human and insect sexual devolvement. It was reported in the AP article that there was concern about this pesticide by the California government, but for some reason it was covered up. Because the AP wire does not keep a researchable history of its archives it has been next to impossible to track down the history of this California study.

But it seems that no one wants to really find out what the hormones ingredients do to help wired a child brain in utero. That would mean the religious right would have to give up their fifth grade understanding of human sexuality based on a bunch of sheepherders from the Bible, and admit that science has more answers then the “just because the Bible says so” theology does.

But on the other hand, from the scientific community, it seems that they want to only study the DNA Human Genome cook book because DNA that’s safe and makes them money. What happens if it has nothing to do with DNA, but has to do with something that can’t be controlled like exposure to hormones? It’s already happen with little Bobbies’ pee pee because mommy worked out in the strawberry field and got exposed to a certain pesticide. And lets not forget that you don’t have to have mom walking in a chemical fog to have the baby exposed to hormones. Mother tends to be a walking hormone factory herself. What happens if mom hormones overrides baby’s DNA (so much for the gay gene)? And like any good theory it has to work for the boys and the girls, not just one or the other. Problem with this theory: It works, if you understand how stress can effect the mother’s hormone production both for estrogen and testosterone. But then we don’t want to know this. It’s easier to judge the transsexual or the homosexual then accept them the way they are.
What scary? We have already changed sex of rats in utreo using hormones, but we in the US dare not speak of it, or fund it. But we in the USA can judge it. We leave real human sexuality science up to the British. And God forbid we think of possibility of doing it to a human being. We can’t get over the idea of Stem Cell research. So again I ask you do we really want to be honest about this? We can’t even talk about sex to our parents or to our kids, so what makes this any different?

I now realize that their stories were a total bunch of baloney. The book had been written years earlier, possibly in the late 1940’s or 1950’s. It was the prevailing opinion, back then, that the only way a homosexual could ever be happy was by becoming heterosexual. I believe Masters and Johnson engaged in OUTRAGEOUS wishful thinking. And worse. They engaged in deception.

How could they possibly report a person having ben “cured” of homosexuality after only one, two or three office visits.

There was no long term follow up.

They gave false hope to gays of that earlier, less enlightened generation.

The vast majority of psychiatrists know that Masters and Johnson were just plain wrong about homosexuality.