<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby-Sachs: Learning more about Ayers and Dohrn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-learning-more-about-ayers-and-dohrn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-learning-more-about-ayers-and-dohrn/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-learning-more-about-ayers-and-dohrn/comment-page-1/#comment-47043</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5954#comment-47043</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify this? You&#039;re saying that since the calls are coming from fringe groups that they are any less valid?  So say some fringe group calls for investigation into a serial killer.  Does that mean that the calls for investigation are less valid? 

Ruby-Sachs, I know you&#039;re a far left liberal.  That&#039;s fine if it makes you happy. But honestly, you really need to form a better argument here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify this? You&#8217;re saying that since the calls are coming from fringe groups that they are any less valid?  So say some fringe group calls for investigation into a serial killer.  Does that mean that the calls for investigation are less valid? </p>
<p>Ruby-Sachs, I know you&#8217;re a far left liberal.  That&#8217;s fine if it makes you happy. But honestly, you really need to form a better argument here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
