<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowenstein: Seriously, President Obama? Seriously?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocco</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-2/#comment-61098</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-61098</guid>
		<description>Good riddance USA
EMIGRATE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good riddance USA<br />
EMIGRATE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61075</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-61075</guid>
		<description>With a &quot;fierce advocate&quot; like this, who needs enemies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a &#8220;fierce advocate&#8221; like this, who needs enemies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61068</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-61068</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s becoming more and more politically strained for Obama to maintain his pro-civil-unions (pro-apartheid, which is what civil unions really are) position given that he was publicly in favor of gay marriage in the 90&#039;s, his Church and the Rev. Wright are in favor of gay marriage, and heck, even Dick Cheney is in favor of gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s becoming more and more politically strained for Obama to maintain his pro-civil-unions (pro-apartheid, which is what civil unions really are) position given that he was publicly in favor of gay marriage in the 90&#8242;s, his Church and the Rev. Wright are in favor of gay marriage, and heck, even Dick Cheney is in favor of gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61066</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-61066</guid>
		<description>When will GLBT people learn that Obama has no time for them? We need to quit wasting time on Obama and ramp up our state by state effort for rights. That where progress will come not from the Obama administration and not from the federal government at this time,

The challenge to the antigay DADT ban was rejected by the US Supreme Court. That is breaking news at this moment, the headline from the online Washington Post newspaper at this moment. Just another message that the gay soldier in the trenches is still a second-class citizen who is not suppose to love, to date, to marry another adult of his or her own gender. Unlike in Canada where gay Canadian military personel can and do marry another office of their own gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will GLBT people learn that Obama has no time for them? We need to quit wasting time on Obama and ramp up our state by state effort for rights. That where progress will come not from the Obama administration and not from the federal government at this time,</p>
<p>The challenge to the antigay DADT ban was rejected by the US Supreme Court. That is breaking news at this moment, the headline from the online Washington Post newspaper at this moment. Just another message that the gay soldier in the trenches is still a second-class citizen who is not suppose to love, to date, to marry another adult of his or her own gender. Unlike in Canada where gay Canadian military personel can and do marry another office of their own gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61060</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-61060</guid>
		<description>Two simple words to describe what i think about all this.

FUCK OBAMA. 

He wont listen to us begging for our rights its time we show him that we can be a threat. It is time we start demanding our rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two simple words to describe what i think about all this.</p>
<p>FUCK OBAMA. </p>
<p>He wont listen to us begging for our rights its time we show him that we can be a threat. It is time we start demanding our rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert, NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-61057</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert, NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-61057</guid>
		<description>Since Obama now is firm in his view that he believes in civil unions as a solution to our equality, and we all know it isn&#039;t,  what he&#039;s doing is endorsing legal segregation, something that the Warren court disagreed with when it granted African-Americans their full civil rights during the 60s.  Maybe he needs to re-read the decision.  He of all people should know better than anyone when the court ruled that separate is not equal. I suspect he is of the view not unlike many African Americans and many whites, particularly right wingers and the majority in the republican party that marriage equality has nothing to do with civil rights.  How convenient for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Obama now is firm in his view that he believes in civil unions as a solution to our equality, and we all know it isn&#8217;t,  what he&#8217;s doing is endorsing legal segregation, something that the Warren court disagreed with when it granted African-Americans their full civil rights during the 60s.  Maybe he needs to re-read the decision.  He of all people should know better than anyone when the court ruled that separate is not equal. I suspect he is of the view not unlike many African Americans and many whites, particularly right wingers and the majority in the republican party that marriage equality has nothing to do with civil rights.  How convenient for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-60959</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-60959</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen anything about this posted on the site:

http://www.towleroad.com/2009/06/signorile-palm-center-source-backs-bellini-claims-on-hrc-deal.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen anything about this posted on the site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.towleroad.com/2009/06/signorile-palm-center-source-backs-bellini-claims-on-hrc-deal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.towleroad.com/2009/06/signorile-palm-center-source-backs-bellini-claims-on-hrc-deal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aiden Raccoon</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-60937</link>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Raccoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-60937</guid>
		<description>Mr Coffee.  &quot;Do no harm&quot; was good enough to elect him over McCain and Palin.  But Obama went and made these gay friendly promises and this time around the mainstream media is pressing him.  If he doesn&#039;t throw us some kind of bone, it is going to be a real issue come election time.  His best course of action is to let GLBT lobbyists do their job, and get legislation written in Congress and then be the guy who signs it into law, after all, the average voter can&#039;t be mad at Obama cause that&#039;s what he promised.  But for Obama to be hardcore gay friendly will alienate moderate right voters and would be more damaging to him come 2012.  He&#039;ll pass legislation that gets to his desk but that&#039;s about it.  I don&#039;t see any initiative on his part coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Coffee.  &#8220;Do no harm&#8221; was good enough to elect him over McCain and Palin.  But Obama went and made these gay friendly promises and this time around the mainstream media is pressing him.  If he doesn&#8217;t throw us some kind of bone, it is going to be a real issue come election time.  His best course of action is to let GLBT lobbyists do their job, and get legislation written in Congress and then be the guy who signs it into law, after all, the average voter can&#8217;t be mad at Obama cause that&#8217;s what he promised.  But for Obama to be hardcore gay friendly will alienate moderate right voters and would be more damaging to him come 2012.  He&#8217;ll pass legislation that gets to his desk but that&#8217;s about it.  I don&#8217;t see any initiative on his part coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewski</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-60934</link>
		<dc:creator>drewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-60934</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not inclined to give Obama a pass on gay issues because he&#039;s taken action on so many different issues.  This week&#039;s speech in Cairo made it clear that this President is not inclined to indulge the whims of expansionists in Israel.  He&#039;s reached out to Muslims with a gesture of respect--not sucking up, but addressing equals.  This is healthy stuff for our country.  He&#039;s taken action on the economy (which isn&#039;t getting better yet, but isn&#039;t racing downhill like it was).  He&#039;s worked to salvage the US auto industry.  He&#039;s done all these things and many more, all within six months.

But not a damn thing for us.  No support for, say, a repeal of DADT to take effect in two years.  No support to repeal DOMA and leave marriage to the states (which wouldn&#039;t change anything anywhere in the South, thanks).  Obama has shown respect and compassion for people across the country and across the planet.  Except us.  Now, if he were to do something as simple as make a speech at some gay dinner, and say that no, he wasn&#039;t pushing on gay stuff yet, because the economy takes precendence, then that would be him acknowledging the absence of movement but not an absence of support (still fishy, but plausible).  Nope, can&#039;t do that.  Of course, when it comes to cockblocking any political love for gays, Nancy Pelosi has been Obama&#039;s wingman, and she needs to come under scrutiny too.  But right now the issue is Obama, and for all the things he&#039;s done, he refuses to resolve the primary civil rights issue of our time.  Anyone who sees him as a master politician would do well to remember that Lyndon Johnson was a dirty S.O.B., and Johnson&#039;s legacy was marred by Vietnam, but Johnson put his political soul into passage of the Civil Rights Act.  He predicted the hit the Democrats would take for leading the charge on civil rights, and he was correct.  (The GOP took advantage and picked up voters who wanted to keep segregation.  This is something to brag about?)  Johnson saw that history would excoriate him for not doing his all to see the Civil Rights Act passed.  Obama acts as if honor and morality are simply yoked to politics in the here and now.  He seems completely blind to time&#039;s ability to reach a different and harsh judgement of those who refuse to do the right thing, and our rights are very much the right thing.

We do not need Obama to achieve our equality.  DOMA and DADT will eventually be repealed, definitely in my lifetime (I&#039;m 41).  We have money and power to advocate for ourselves, and we are doing so.  We&#039;re bruised from fighting, and it would be nice if our &quot;friend&quot; could bestir himself to at least get us some Gatorade, but we&#039;ll get through without him.  I suspect that history will judge Obama more harshly on gay issues than it will Shrub, because Obama presents himself as so enlightened, where Shrub...hell, you know.  It&#039;s easier to forgive ignorance than it is to overlook a conscious gesture to deny equality to any Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not inclined to give Obama a pass on gay issues because he&#8217;s taken action on so many different issues.  This week&#8217;s speech in Cairo made it clear that this President is not inclined to indulge the whims of expansionists in Israel.  He&#8217;s reached out to Muslims with a gesture of respect&#8211;not sucking up, but addressing equals.  This is healthy stuff for our country.  He&#8217;s taken action on the economy (which isn&#8217;t getting better yet, but isn&#8217;t racing downhill like it was).  He&#8217;s worked to salvage the US auto industry.  He&#8217;s done all these things and many more, all within six months.</p>
<p>But not a damn thing for us.  No support for, say, a repeal of DADT to take effect in two years.  No support to repeal DOMA and leave marriage to the states (which wouldn&#8217;t change anything anywhere in the South, thanks).  Obama has shown respect and compassion for people across the country and across the planet.  Except us.  Now, if he were to do something as simple as make a speech at some gay dinner, and say that no, he wasn&#8217;t pushing on gay stuff yet, because the economy takes precendence, then that would be him acknowledging the absence of movement but not an absence of support (still fishy, but plausible).  Nope, can&#8217;t do that.  Of course, when it comes to cockblocking any political love for gays, Nancy Pelosi has been Obama&#8217;s wingman, and she needs to come under scrutiny too.  But right now the issue is Obama, and for all the things he&#8217;s done, he refuses to resolve the primary civil rights issue of our time.  Anyone who sees him as a master politician would do well to remember that Lyndon Johnson was a dirty S.O.B., and Johnson&#8217;s legacy was marred by Vietnam, but Johnson put his political soul into passage of the Civil Rights Act.  He predicted the hit the Democrats would take for leading the charge on civil rights, and he was correct.  (The GOP took advantage and picked up voters who wanted to keep segregation.  This is something to brag about?)  Johnson saw that history would excoriate him for not doing his all to see the Civil Rights Act passed.  Obama acts as if honor and morality are simply yoked to politics in the here and now.  He seems completely blind to time&#8217;s ability to reach a different and harsh judgement of those who refuse to do the right thing, and our rights are very much the right thing.</p>
<p>We do not need Obama to achieve our equality.  DOMA and DADT will eventually be repealed, definitely in my lifetime (I&#8217;m 41).  We have money and power to advocate for ourselves, and we are doing so.  We&#8217;re bruised from fighting, and it would be nice if our &#8220;friend&#8221; could bestir himself to at least get us some Gatorade, but we&#8217;ll get through without him.  I suspect that history will judge Obama more harshly on gay issues than it will Shrub, because Obama presents himself as so enlightened, where Shrub&#8230;hell, you know.  It&#8217;s easier to forgive ignorance than it is to overlook a conscious gesture to deny equality to any Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/lowenstein-seriously-president-obama-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-60910</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7826#comment-60910</guid>
		<description>Pet Issue?

Equality a &quot;Pet Issue?&quot;

WOW, these Obama-kins are really brain washed.  Scary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pet Issue?</p>
<p>Equality a &#8220;Pet Issue?&#8221;</p>
<p>WOW, these Obama-kins are really brain washed.  Scary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
