November 21st, 2009
 

365Gay Agenda Blog

Lowenstein: Sec. Clinton to provide equal benefits for gay diplomats

By Jenna Lowenstein, 365gay blogger 05.25.2009 10:03am EDT

blog-hillary-flag-top

In an internal memo sent to the Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced last week that the State Department will begin granting equal benefits to the spouses of gay diplomats.

Secretary Clinton indicated shortly after assuming her role as head of the State Department that she intended to change the benefit rules for same-sex couples. At the first town-hall she held with employees of the State Department, Clinton said that she saw the issue “as an issue of workplace fairness, employee retention, and the safety and effectiveness of our embassy communities.”

She echoed those themes in her memo announcing the change:

In a notice to be sent soon to State Department employees, Clinton says regulations that denied same-sex couples and their families the same rights and privileges that straight diplomats enjoyed are “unfair and must end,” as they harm U.S. diplomacy.

“Providing training, medical care and other benefits to domestic partners promote the cohesiveness, safety and effectiveness of our posts abroad,” she says in the message, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press.

“It will also help the department attract and retain personnel in a competitive environment where domestic partner benefits and allowances are increasingly the norm for world-class employers,” she says.

“At bottom, the department will provide these benefits for both opposite-sex and same-sex domestic partners because it is the right thing to do,” Clinton says.

According to the New York Times, the new benefits granted same-sex partners include diplomatic passports, use of medical facilities, emergency evacuation from posts, transportation between posts, and training in security and languages.

All these benefits– in particular those safety-related elements like emergency evacuation for same-sex partners– are essential to the gay diplomats currently serving as part of the foreign service. Secretary Clinton and the Obama administration should be applauded for acknowleging the importance of change for the families of same-sex diplomats. But we should not allow this to become their demonstration of their commitment to the LGBT community.

It is an important step, but, if anything, it demonstrates only that they do believe in the importance of equality and their actions to the contrary are, at root, political calculations. So kudos, Secretary Clinton and the Obama administration, for this step toward justice. But let’s not let it distract us from larger, national fights that impact millions of LGBT people, same-sex couples, and families across the country.g


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Morgan Said: May 26th, 2009 at 1:41 am
    • Will the Next Secretary of State be able to reverse this change? Let me check my closet to see where I stored that crystal ball since the last time I used it…..

      Over some very irate gay foreign service people and their supporters is how the next secretary of state will reverse this change!

      This issue is why Ambassador Michael Guest of Romania quit under the Bush Administration. Apart from the glaringly unequal treatment of straight married foreign service personel compared with that of gay coupled foreign service personel as outlined in this article as well as his same-sex partner’s safety and well-being such he need to evacuated was to Michael naturally a heck of lot more important than his career.

      Hopefully, with these changes under Secretary of State Clinton, Michael Guest will at least have a chance to get back into some foreign service post if he wants to.

  • drewski Said: May 26th, 2009 at 12:16 am
    • I’ve been waiting for Hillary to find a subtle way to take advantage of Obama’s inaction. She doesn’t have Bill’s political acumen, but she’s sharp enough to see that Obama has alienated gays–and gays can cough up some serious campaign cash. I applaud her actions, and I’m thinking this is the equivalent of an executive order, so yes, it could be undone by her or her successor. Point is that Hillary is taking concrete action to remove obstacles to gays in the State Department, which is in contrast to either Obama or the other talking-head Dems. I’m thinking that Hillary sees Obama’s failure with gays and is already looking at an angle for 2012.

  • TC in Brooklyn Said: May 25th, 2009 at 11:23 pm
    • Trace, I don’t think, under these circumstances, four months into a Clinton Administration would have been tremendously different. Things like DADT and DOMA are not policies that President Obama can reverse on his own. To make those changes stick, we need Congress to make them. So pressure has to be put on both Obama and Congress to do what’s right.

  • Trace Said: May 25th, 2009 at 10:09 pm
    • Kinda makes ya wonder what would have been if it had been President Hillary Clinton.

  • Rob in Phoenix Said: May 25th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
    • Will the next Secretary of State be able to REVERSE this change?

  • Alexa Said: May 25th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
    • I find it intriguing that here on 365gay.com I see the terminology “equal benefits” while other news outlets use “similar” or “some of”. I wonder which is the truth.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook