November 22nd, 2009
 

365Gay Agenda Blog

Davis: When Gay Seeps out the Seams

By Ali Davis, Contributing writer 08.10.2009 10:17pm EDT
Culture & Ideas

Northwest Arkansas Online (hilariously and startlingly abbreviated as “NWA Online” in its masthead) reports that Reverend Bradley Barber has been removed as the priest of St. Joseph Catholic Church after allegedly assaulting a parishioner.

The accuser is a young man “in his early 20’s,” (Barber is 53), and the alleged assault happened at Barber’s home, sometime between 3:00 and 5:00 a.m. on Tuesday morning.

Um…

Barber has not spent his entire career as a Catholic priest. He used to be an Episcopal priest, but left the church because he disagreed with the new policies of allowing LGBT priests and sanctioning same-sex relationships.

Um…

Obviously, I have no way of knowing what happened between the accuser and the accused.

And I’m sure this is a painful situation for Barber’s congregation. Please believe that compassion is in my thoughts when I say this:

Duh, you guys.

This is what happens when you try to force people to be something that they aren’t. Or worse, when you tell them that what they fundamentally are is a bad, bad thing.

Many people will run away from your flock (have you noticed?), but some will try their best to squeeze themselves into the rigid boxes that have been set up for them.

And while they tie themselves up in knots and pray to be better people and hate themselves for not being straight, some of the gay can’t help but leak out the seams.

And what you get is this: A situation that was either nonconsensual or consensual at the time but so wrapped up in guilt and loathing that it’s now being reported as an assault. Who is being brought closer to God by this?

We’ve been shown over and over that spirituality doesn’t have to be like that. There are two stories today on 365Gay alone that note the widespread, active involvement of members of the LGBT community in Christian churches, and other religions with open, inclusive attitudes see similar enthusiastic participation.

Spirituality, while hardly essential for a happy, moral, and fulfilling life, can be a wonderful thing, adding a heartening and invigorating depth to one’s experience.

I get sickened and saddened when I see it twisted into a vehicle for showing – or hammering home – what is “wrong” with people.

I just saw Jesus Camp for the first time this weekend. Many of my friends were most disturbed by the political indoctrination, and, yeah, that’s creepy as all get out.

But what struck me the most was the number of times the kids in the movie – kids of 8 or 9 – were shamed into crying. In between being told they were to be the new young warriors of God, they were taught, over and over, how unworthy they were.

I bring it up because, while it’s hard to feel sympathy for the adult Barber’s homophobia, I do feel some compassion for the young Barber and the process that turned him into what he is.

We all know, both from anecdotal evidence and the occasional psychology experiment, that the people who rail hardest against The Gay tend to be people who are fighting off their own same-sex desires. Which makes sense: You don’t have to worry about people or magazines or television turning you gay if you’ve never been interested.

And heaven knows Barber tried not to be gay. He got married and had kids. (The Catholic Church allows converted priests to maintain their marriages.) He fought against LGBT encroachment in his own church and finally ran to Catholicism to get as far away from it as he could.

And yet somehow there he was with a young man in his house sometime after 3:00 in the morning.

I don’t know Barber or the situation well enough to say anything about whether he, personally, is good, bad, or somewhere in between.

But I do know that the process that leads to these painful situations is awful. And it doesn’t have to be this way.

So how do we offer compassion and a lifeline to people who are caught in the middle of it? As tempting as it is to peacefully demonstrate at, say, a rally by a hostile Evangelical church with literature and helpline phone numbers, it seems like setting up an ongoing game of Rainbow Rover would be unproductive in the long run.

And would probably play into the accusations of trying to “turn people gay”.

But I still feel bad for the young people being hammered into those little boxes, or the people who are still trying to fit even when there is so much that squeezes out the edges in such a painful way.

I take heart in the fact that so many religions are offering a warm welcome to those in the LGBT community, and hope that word gets out that being who you are doesn’t have to mean giving up your favorite deity. In fact, it can help you meet a friendlier, more relaxed, and more positive version.

And I also take heart in the fact that information tends to seep out the seams on the Internet too.

If you’re here because of a Google search and some feelings you’re not comfortable with, hello and welcome. Take a look around and know that there are plenty of organizations – including churches – that don’t think there is a thing wrong with you.

Take care and good luck.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • DaveW Said: August 12th, 2009 at 9:10 am
    • It simply saddens me that gays are trapped into the lies of religion just like so many straights. Just shows us that sexuality does not correlate with intelligence.

      But I expect more of gays, who have been bashed by religion for so long. We should be more educated on this issue by now!

      There is a related story on here about “affirming” churches. What a joke. “we used to hate you but now we need the money so we are going to tolerate you”.

      Why join a cult in the first place regardless of your sexuality?

      Ali says it may give people peace, comfort, community. Well, you can find that without paying into a cult that runs a worldwide exploitation regime.

      We are the worst form of apologists when we try to fit religion into our lives….I believe worse than women. Women should reject religion too since it targets them, but they are part of the “holy matrimony/breeding” scheme and it is harder to reject…but for us, we don’t have that baggage.

      Still not getting it over here…

  • throatman Said: August 12th, 2009 at 8:08 am
    • Micheal J. Youell.
      49 maine-et-Loire,Saumur.France
      Very interested
      0241-50—6

  • Tara Said: August 11th, 2009 at 5:43 pm
    • I was raised RC and hate to bust you bubble about this being about sex it might not be.

      In the RC church people come to see the priest at all hours. Sometimes because of grief over the death of a love one, having a crisses of faith such as sexuality identity, drinking, sex, etc.

      Have any of you thought that the young man in question might have gone to him because he was confused over his sexuality and sought support from the church.

      Have any of you thought that maybe this man went seeing help over his confusion as all children of RC are train to do. This so-call man of god, Reverend Bradley Barber decided that he have to beat the gayness of this young man.

      That this attack was based on Reverend Bradley Barber hatred of gays. That this young man was a victim of gay bashing.

  • Drewski Said: August 11th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
    • @Bruce–it (NWA Online) was funny, if you feel the need to be *that* serious, then go read the Congressional Quarterly.

      Sexual assault is implied in that the encounter took place at a time when the vast majority of people are asleep (or having sex). You don’t go visit Aunt Margie at 3 AM, right? You DO go for a booty call at 3 AM. There’s nothing said about a spiritual emergency, which would be a very valid reason to pop up at the priest’s door (was this at the parsonage?). If it’s not spiritual counseling, and it’s not a social call (again, what 58-year-old married man has visitors at 3 AM? No.), then that leaves the presumption of a sexual encounter. Assuming this goes to trial, the nature of the encounter will be made clear. Yes, it could be that the whole thing is some hustler trying to make a fast buck off a closeted priest, but remember that it’s the priest who’s under the presumption of keeping hands and genitals to self. The fact that the accused is a priest does change the case, because part of determining the truth is determining what happened. If the priest was gonna get some nookie, then the charges are bogus, but he’s violating the standards of conduct laid down by his own church, and that will definitely have consequences. So there’s the implied sexual nature of the attack.

  • charley Said: August 11th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
    • Hooray. The closet case outed himself!

  • Twisted Pride Said: August 11th, 2009 at 11:27 am
    • @Kari@Jessica@Bruce
      Well said!!

  • Warren Said: August 11th, 2009 at 10:54 am
    • Bottom line: while we don’t know the details clearly what ever happened had to be pretty bad for the church to remove a priest. I mean seriously folks!

  • Jessi Said: August 11th, 2009 at 9:34 am
    • am I missing something?
      where does this say ’sexual assault’? and if it doesn’t why are we assuming it is?

  • Jessica K Said: August 11th, 2009 at 9:01 am
    • @Leeanne Henry
      “What was this younger man wearing?” As if that is an excuse to rape someone, WTF?

      It is not OK to rape a woman if she is scantily dressed and it isn’t OK to rape a man who dresses similar either. Nor is it appropriate to use that type of defense in a trial.

  • Kari Said: August 11th, 2009 at 8:55 am
    • Leeanna: Blaming the victim isn’t cool.

  • robertocucina Said: August 11th, 2009 at 8:39 am
    • It begs the question, what was this young man doing with Barber during the early hours before dawn to be invited into his home? Seems a bit odd if its not about sexual contact.

  • Bruce Said: August 11th, 2009 at 8:38 am
    • Facebookuser…. just ask Davis for a date… don’t express baseless flattery as a comment!

      Victor … I agree!

      Leanne Harris ….I can’t believe you typed that!

      How absolutely archaic your thoughts are …. one does not deserve to be treeted poorly because someone finds their garb tittlillaing.

      Ali Davis….WTF is this comment about “hilariously and startlingly abbreviated as “NWA Online”?
      Why would you make such a juvenile comment under the guise of journalism or is THIS too another entertainment piece like your convoluted Rachel Watch comments on a commment.

      Perhaps Davis should be a commenter rather than a contributing writer!

  • Leeanne Menses Henry Said: August 11th, 2009 at 7:26 am
    • What was this younger man wearing? Why was he in Barber’s home? Seems to me like someone was asking for it.

  • Victor1959 Said: August 11th, 2009 at 5:10 am
    • um… did any one give the slightest thought to the idea that Mr Barber may well have done nothing more then allow another type of “basher” into his home? When was the idea of innocent until PROVEN guilty tossed out due to ones past? This sounds far more like the folks that came up with the “homo-panic defense” then anyone part of the LGBT subset.

  • Facebook User Said: August 10th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
    • Beautifully put! Thank you!

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook