Daigle: Dear Maggie Gallagher

Dear Maggie Gallagher,
I just watched the video you made concerning the victory of anti-marriage equality advocates in Maine.
And though we’ve never met (a product, no doubt, of some great cosmic alignment of the stars in the universe — one that I consider myself grateful for every single day), I feel as though I know you. So I felt compelled to write to you this morning, in the hopes we might better understand each other.
In your video, you say we are stunned and hurt and upset over the loss in Maine. You’re right, Maggie. We are. We’re stunned that the “Yes on 1″ campaign used the same revolting, slanderous messages that have been used against us for years — that we’re child predators, that our marriages would rob people of religious freedom, that all we want is to indoctrinate children into the big scary horror that is Homosexuality. We’re hurt that people still believe all that nonsense, that decent, intelligent Americans still fall prey to such blatant fear-mongering from people who can’t use actual arguments against ours. And we’re very upset, Maggie. We’re upset that for the second time in a very short time, strangers have been given the power to decide how the law treats other people, and strangers have decided for gay men and women whether or not they can keep the right to codify and protect their relationship.
See, Mags (can I call you Mags? Come on, I mean it with affection. I nickname all my friends, and we’re friends, aren’t we?), I watched your video, and I realized you have absolutely no idea what we’re stunned, hurt or upset about. And if we’re going to be pals, I think you should at least take the time to know something real about me. So, lend me your ear, Mags, because I want to let you in on the secret you’re missing, the little piece of the puzzle you haven’t fully figured out yet.
With a little devilish twinkle in your eye (and don’t think I didn’t see it there, because I did! I so did! The mediocre webcam lighting didn’t fool me for a second!), I saw you talk about our loss with a barely repressed glee — we lost and you guys won! — and every time you mentioned us you called us “advocates” or some other impersonal nomenclature, and all of a sudden, I got it. I got you, Mags. Finally. After such a long time of not getting you.
This fight — You think it’s all about ballot boxes and campaigns and videos and votes and which states you win and which ones you lose and what commercials can we run on which stations and what do the polls say and how can we beat them, how can we win?
For us, it’s not about that at all. For us… it’s our lives, Mags.
Fess up, Mags. You can tell me the truth. Because I’m not going to tell anyone (seriously, nobody reads this, don’t worry): It’s a game to you, right? Because that’s easy, right? It’s easier just to create these cartoon versions of actual cultural moments because to actually deal with what’s happening and with real people’s lives would be complicated and harder to spin? It’s just a way to cast people in roles that make them feel good about themselves (you know, you’re the little guy standing up against the big bad monolith and if we all just stick together — and donate some funds to the cause — we’re gonna bring that big bad monolith down! Right? I’m right. Come on, Mags. You can tell me.)
Mags, I have to share this with you, because I feel we’ve become close: you remind me of someone. Well, a bunch of someones actually.
We have these women all across Lafayette (I’m in Lafayette, Louisiana, nice little city in south Louisiana, you should stop by!), these women who have wealthy husbands and really terrific houses (in River Ranch, it’s our planned community, kind of creepy if you ask me) and they have very little to do with their time other than wait in their really terrific houses for their wealthy husbands to come home in the evenings, so their days are filled with the pursuit of Meaning — not little old regular meaning, but Capital M Meaning, the kind that transforms a life from a collection of connected days to a living, breathing agent of change in the world.
They look for Meaning everywhere — in every club, gathering, organization they can think of (because nothing says Meaning like being in a room with other people looking for Meaning as well, right? Meaning by association! Awesome!) — and when they find a message they can wrap their mind around, they grab onto it with a vice grip and wrestle it to the ground, they take that message and tuck it into the deepest part of who they are and they repeat it and shout it until the message takes root there and becomes less of a message and more of an identity, a signpost of worth, a foundation upon which Meaning can be built.
They don’t have to believe the message. It doesn’t matter if it’s true to them or true in any sense of the word. It just has to work with others. Because when your Meaning is wrapped up in a message, the only way to sustain it is for others to agree with you.
You remind me of those women, Mags. All this shrieking and hyperbole and grand religious metaphor — it doesn’t sound to me like a belief. It sounds to me like a grasp at Meaning.
Because there are a lot of people in this country who still get scared of men like me, right? And all it takes is a little grandstanding, a nicely chosen word, a little divisive rhetoric and all of a sudden, those people are looking to you with admiration, looking to you for guidance, and you’re getting on TV and the news and suddenly Maggie Gallagher isn’t just someone’s name — it Means something.
I don’t blame you, Mags. Everyone wants Meaning. But you’re earning on the backs of people like me, people who work hard, contribute positive things to the community, who love with honesty and integrity and who don’t deserve to be slandered and spit on and attacked in the way your organization has attacked us.
That’s not cool, Mags. And there are times when I suspect you know it. Because while others may just dismiss you as a raving lunatic with delusions of grandeur (just saying what I’ve heard), I think there are nights when you turn out the light and lie there in dark and you know, in the secret place we all have inside of us, that what you’re doing is wrong.
Next time you have one of those nights, think about me, Mags. I’ll be in the dark in some other part of the world, and I’ll be sleeping well. Because I haven’t built my sense of self on the backs of anyone. I found Meaning in the right place — within myself.
Be well, Maggie Gallagher. I look forward to your next video.



Cody, this is another beautiful piece. The truly heartfelt concepts that you raise are MEANINGful. They are expressed with genuine emotion and personal sincerity. If the opinion and belief in a cause is outweighed by the interest in marketing and fundraising and promotion of the cause for social status, then “The Cause” becomes nothing more than a faux non-profit organization that truly helps no one.
To God is Good, try to educate (poison) yourself with the statistics and factual evidence regarding how many heterosexual marriages (you know, the ones that are legal and thus valid) end in divorce. Take a look at the statistics of non-partisan studies that show just how many legally married (heterosexual) people can not accomplish marital fidelity. Get a concept of the information in the world of psychological studies that indicate that monogamy among married couples seems to be culturally on it’s way out. You might then understand that heterosexual humans are morally harming the very concept of the sanctity of marriage at a frightening pace.
GIG, please notice your posts here have not been deleted. We allow you to post, even though you don’t know us. I tried for a number of years to find my heterosexuality. I dated all though High School and college. I chose to not marry my sweetheart. It wasn’t right to her or me. She and I continue to be close friends and agree that I was the best decision I made. I was never molested by anyone. Please don’t generalize your hyperbole to encompass all of us. My parents were happily married for over 40 years.
I find it interesting that our census doesn’t tabulate these statistics in the census. next year is the first year we will count partnered same sex couples.
For the last two years or more I have paid close attention to pedophile cases in the news. All have involved heterosexual contact, none have involved homosexuals. Seems it’s dangerous to allow children with clergy and coaches. Interesting. not scientific but merely observation.
GiG Please continue to post, it is educational for us here who are gay to see your hatred and point of view. we don’t deny you that right, like you deny us the rights and responsibilities of marriage.
You are an excellent writer Cody Daigle.
@ Dog is Doo:
Honey, you’re so crazy you probably wear crinolines to a tractor-pull.
There are many sites online where you can purchase a large variety of sex-toys (batteries not included); please go to one and buy yourself a BIG, FAT, LONG dildo and some Hot Lube ™, since you obviously can’t get yourself LAID in the REAL world.
My husband and I have been together for thirty-three years, and neither one of us gives a rat’s patootie if one of us goes out and gets a piece of strange from time to time.
We also like to have sex with my EX-husband, who’s still around, and good friends with both of us.
Screw you and your konservative kristianist kult (KKK for short) … by all means, continue to spew your puerile, ignorant rantings … it’s minorly entertaining till my supper gets done (I’m in California, which hasn’t burned up or floated out to sea as a result of the Almighty Flying Spaghetti Monster’s wrath at all the same-sex carryings-on in our fair state.
P.S. – If you’re poor and can’t afford sex-toys, a cucumber and lard work just fine.
Have a nice night!
Cheers,
Rusty Burgoon-Clark
GIG: I accept your statistic: Thus, out of a population of 106,741,426 households, homosexuals represent 0.42% of those households. That is less than one half of one percent!
OK, so gay people make up a tiny, miniscule, insignificant part of the population. So that begs the question: What are you so afraid of????
Such a small group can’t really redefine anything by itself for the society at large.
There are certainly enough marriage licenses to go around.
So why expend all the resources to keep such a small group disenfranchised?
Oh, because you dogmatically adhere to some antiquated paradigm that never really existed.
Dear God,
Just thought I would poop on your little 30 year old statistics. You mistakenly attribute the fact that studies could only find a limited number of openly gay couples to a lack of such couples. Obviously you have no idea what it was like for gay people back in the 70s and 80s. Major discrimination ensued when someone identified themselves as openly gay. Anyone with half a brain would realize that it would have been quite difficult to find many openly gay people, period, during that era.
Oh, and for your information, my partner and I are celebrating 13 wonderful, monogamous, loving years together this week. We’ve been through good times and bad, and despite the fact that pissants like you seem to think you know better than we do how to tend to our relationship, we’ve done a pretty damn good job of it. We’re in it for the long haul, even though it is most unlikely that we will ever have a marriage license. Let’s just see how many of your fellow straight couples could say that (and mean it!).
Not doing the stereotype any justice Raymond! There are in fact many of us abominable same-sex couples who value monogomy.
Now, I am by no means trying to tell you how to live your life. That is no ones’ prerogative but yours. I am simply pointing out that by sharing the fact that you and your husband have no problem with getting some “strange” on the side, you unwittingly perpetuate the myth that same-sex relationships are only about sex.
It is just those sorts of statements that the opposition would gleefully grab on to to justify the notion that we should not be afforded equal rights under the law.
Like I said, live your life how you see fit, just remember that sometimes there are benifits to not kissing and telling.
Respectfully yours,
MavsFan
I know Maggie can gloat. They managed to take away civil rights from a small segment of the community. It didn’t even matter to them that there are children being harmed by their actions.
Well gloat away Maggie, but I wonder what the parishioners of the two churches in Lewiston, Maine that have closed their doors for lack of funds. Money for bigotry won’t be so easy to come by when the whorehouses are shuttered.
Bud…you know, I can count on you to be real. It feels good to witness that. Real people tend to win out in the long run over the fakes like Maggie Gallagher. Bud, it’s people like you who are living, and not cowering in utter fear that they might not matter, might not be the most popular, and somehow manage to conflate the two and create a pathetic monster.
Cody, thank you. Well-written and, I think, on target. It’s a reminder that the bullshit we’re fighting has a lot to do with people who harbor a great deal of insecurity. Their sense of self is warped and damaged. Our opponents are fearful people who are terrified of the risk that comes with self-awareness and with asking questions. Anyone who spends as much time as Maggie Gallagher and her ilk do on micromanaging the lives of other people…it’s usually people with empty lives who feel compelled to comfort themselves by being meddling, isn’t it? It’s a distraction from that sense of emptiness, but they’re so scared they don’t understand that discriminating against other people doesn’t quiet that emptiness or that insecurity. It’s still there, and it will manifest in some other way.
God is Good, if gay people can’t form lasting relationships as you claim, then explain why one in two straight marriages fail and why do so many straights commit adultery as much as they do, politicians included while holding up the sanctity of marriage mantra? Why do so many straight males father children out of wedlock sometimes with several women? Why do married straight males seek out prostitutes?. Why are straight males involved in sex trafficking?
There sure is a lot of crap flowing on this page today!
David in Houston, Butt Buddy, Butt surfing, even hot dog rodeo were all used by religious nut jobs on regular regional newspaper comment sections in Maine during the fight we just lost.
Saying real christians don’t act like that is wrong. Nobody hates and spreads divisiveness and foul language better than christians. GIG is just being true to his cult.
Now, GIG, you are not fooling us even if perhaps you fool yourself.
Not enough gays to grant us equality? What a stupid argument. In fact most of your points are about gay sex and why gay sex invalidates gay marriage. We never discuss sex when two hets want to marry. In fact we almost never discuss suitablility. It is simply stupid and obviously drawn from religious hipocritical practice to raise the bar for gays to marry and use that as an argument for not allowing it. You are simply a bigot and will front stupid arguments to protect your bigotry.
Anyone using the name God is Good must be a total fool anyway. Your god is the most evil of all cult deities man has ever invented. There is absolutely nothing good about this human construct. Perhaps in allowing you to be shallow and narrow minded this god is good for you but I would argue your suffering would end if you gave up this evil god.
Now on to the last point….I haven’t read all these comments but I’m sure it has been brought up: why the obsession with gays and gay sex? It seems to me you are protecting yourself, not society, from this “evil”.
If this had nothing to do with you I don’t see why you’d hide behind delusional medieval beliefs to justify your prejudice. I rather think this is very close to you, as you suggest of others perhaps daddy liked to be your butt buddy, or perhaps you have a hot friend on the football team that you can’t shower with without revealing your “excitement”.
I hope I’m wrong and you are just a bigoted pig, vs. a self hating bigoted pig. Either wayt you have a snout and curly tail and a big fat belly, so it would be no consolation to remove the self hating part.
Pig.
Mavs, you accuse Bud of playing into the bigots hands by revealing truths about our sex lives.
However, you are in fact feeding into their hands by acknowledging it is ok to judge people’s sex lives. I know you didn’t say that but by admonishing Bud you imply it is ok.
We got where we are by being out, and lying about who we are now will not help. In fact I believe there is so much prejudice because the straight guys are simply jealous of our sexual freedom. Not to say they want to be free to have gay sex, but just observing that straight guys are incredibly sexually repressed and we are not so much, and they are jealous. That leads to them thinking badly about themselves, being jealous of gay guys doing each other, confusing that with lust and then needing to lash out even stronger to strengthen their straight-ness.
Now, it may be uncomfortable for narrow minded idiots like god is a goofball to here this, but they’d be similarly uncomfortable sitting in on a discussion of straight sexual antics like swinging etc.
This type of sexual experimenting and looseness is ALL OVER our culture and gay men are no different. Admonishing ourselves for being honest is simply the wrong way to gain our freedoms. I don’t want freedom if it means I have to lie about who I am.
I also don’t think we should be running around with banners on our cars saying we sleep around, but that was not Bud’s point. He was simply saying we do what hets do, nobody should be keeping score. And I suspect he wanted to creep God is a Lie out a little bit.
I will never submit to a monogomy requirement. Just like I will not settle for civil unions. Straights do not have these things and changing the rules for us feels like a poll test. Blacks should not have been subjected to them and NEITHER SHOULD WE.
So to Bud: congrats and have fun with your samplings of strange! I enjoy your comments as much as many who have said that and I will never ask you to lie to the haters simply to make me look better.
Gig accuses us of being obsessed with sex. I allege it’s the str8 world that is. They sow their wild oats til marriage. Once they marry, they meet new people and query, Are you married? Kids? Kids come from sex, with or without marriage Look at the number of children born out of wedlock. A young girl has one child out of wedlock, it more likely to follow it up with another. Please don’t educate them about the possiblility of pregnancy or offer them condoms or education to avoid an unwanted pregnancy. And when a man contributes to the conception of a child, please please don’t hold him financially responsible. it’s the bitch who let him between her legs responsibility and fault. There will always be a gay couple to adopt the kids, if not adopt, we’ll foster them!
Only an asshole would care what goes into an asshole and who puts it there!
Only someone who’s really repressed would attempt to decide for the rest!
welcome tot he south it is worse and if you belong to a church some group of important you do have alot of say and who goes in the town be careful evil spell backward is a live
Maggie Gallegher is lying hatemonger. If she was just protecting marriage, her organization would not push anti-Famiy amendments which also ban civil unions / domestic partnerships etc.
It’s time we call her on her homophobic behavior.