<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Withers: Did anyone really pay attention to Obama?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/112708-liberals-in-shock-over-obamas-national-security-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/112708-liberals-in-shock-over-obamas-national-security-team/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewski</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/112708-liberals-in-shock-over-obamas-national-security-team/comment-page-1/#comment-33288</link>
		<dc:creator>drewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=4383#comment-33288</guid>
		<description>Jim--Yeah, it was a column worth writing because the externally-assigned role of President Obama has been all over the place.  He&#039;s advocate for the disenfranchised.  No, he&#039;s a perpetuator of a messed-up status quo.  He&#039;s a dove, maybe incapable of engaging a legitimate military deployment.  No, he&#039;s really much closer to the status quo (which ususally involves using force where it&#039;s deemed convenient by Wall Street or corporate interests).  He&#039;s a socialist and he&#039;ll take our guns and herald the advent of the Apocalypse.  No, he&#039;s really just more of the same.

It does make a difference which choices he makes.  Sometimes, the conservative gesture--saving an economic system--involves some radical action--massive government intervention not seen in the US in decades.  What constitues liberal, or conservative, or radical?  Those are old labels from a passing time.  The &quot;liberal&quot; saves something--that&#039;s the very definition of a political conservative.  

These are legitimate areas of concern.  President Obama is very good at playing his cards close.  His campaign showed that he runs a very loyal, very on-point support organization.  I suspect the Obama White House will be less prone to leaks than even the Bush administrations were.  This isn&#039;t likely to be a repeat of the Clinton melodrama, because Obama is not that.  Again, an Obama more concerned with righting the badly damaged ship of state is an Obama not likely to put gay issues at the top of the list unless it&#039;s clearly a broadly shared stance. Only time will tell, but the campaign gave at least some insight into the M O of this new President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim&#8211;Yeah, it was a column worth writing because the externally-assigned role of President Obama has been all over the place.  He&#8217;s advocate for the disenfranchised.  No, he&#8217;s a perpetuator of a messed-up status quo.  He&#8217;s a dove, maybe incapable of engaging a legitimate military deployment.  No, he&#8217;s really much closer to the status quo (which ususally involves using force where it&#8217;s deemed convenient by Wall Street or corporate interests).  He&#8217;s a socialist and he&#8217;ll take our guns and herald the advent of the Apocalypse.  No, he&#8217;s really just more of the same.</p>
<p>It does make a difference which choices he makes.  Sometimes, the conservative gesture&#8211;saving an economic system&#8211;involves some radical action&#8211;massive government intervention not seen in the US in decades.  What constitues liberal, or conservative, or radical?  Those are old labels from a passing time.  The &#8220;liberal&#8221; saves something&#8211;that&#8217;s the very definition of a political conservative.  </p>
<p>These are legitimate areas of concern.  President Obama is very good at playing his cards close.  His campaign showed that he runs a very loyal, very on-point support organization.  I suspect the Obama White House will be less prone to leaks than even the Bush administrations were.  This isn&#8217;t likely to be a repeat of the Clinton melodrama, because Obama is not that.  Again, an Obama more concerned with righting the badly damaged ship of state is an Obama not likely to put gay issues at the top of the list unless it&#8217;s clearly a broadly shared stance. Only time will tell, but the campaign gave at least some insight into the M O of this new President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Webber</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/112708-liberals-in-shock-over-obamas-national-security-team/comment-page-1/#comment-32988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Webber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=4383#comment-32988</guid>
		<description>Was this even worth writing? What is the point? Sounds like you are just picking the fly-sh*t out of the pepper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this even worth writing? What is the point? Sounds like you are just picking the fly-sh*t out of the pepper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrrrlRomeo</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/112708-liberals-in-shock-over-obamas-national-security-team/comment-page-1/#comment-32926</link>
		<dc:creator>GrrrlRomeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=4383#comment-32926</guid>
		<description>Did anyone really pay attention to Obama?

Uhmm...yes? Invading Afghanistan was right. Invading Iraq was wrong. The Taliban and al Qaeda are the enemy. That&#039;s been my opinion from the get go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone really pay attention to Obama?</p>
<p>Uhmm&#8230;yes? Invading Afghanistan was right. Invading Iraq was wrong. The Taliban and al Qaeda are the enemy. That&#8217;s been my opinion from the get go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewski</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/112708-liberals-in-shock-over-obamas-national-security-team/comment-page-1/#comment-32919</link>
		<dc:creator>drewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=4383#comment-32919</guid>
		<description>There is nothing in Obama&#039;s actions or his words that directly confirms a dovish position.  Ditto for any impulse for a socialist makeover.  I voted for him because I saw him as wanting to stop the demolition of our economic system.  He&#039;s not here to protest war, but to wage war in a practical manner.  He&#039;s not here to make Wall Street advocate for the poor, but to restore functional order to our financial system.  At this point, especially after eight years of Dubya, his stance is revolutionary.  He&#039;s a sober centrist.  Anybody who really expects him to make unilateral efforts at major progressive actions hasn&#039;t paid much attention to his past.  None of that seems bad to me--and if he manages to achieve all of this stabilization, it still leaves room for a Democrat who would follow similar policies, but would perhaps be more overtly gay-friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing in Obama&#8217;s actions or his words that directly confirms a dovish position.  Ditto for any impulse for a socialist makeover.  I voted for him because I saw him as wanting to stop the demolition of our economic system.  He&#8217;s not here to protest war, but to wage war in a practical manner.  He&#8217;s not here to make Wall Street advocate for the poor, but to restore functional order to our financial system.  At this point, especially after eight years of Dubya, his stance is revolutionary.  He&#8217;s a sober centrist.  Anybody who really expects him to make unilateral efforts at major progressive actions hasn&#8217;t paid much attention to his past.  None of that seems bad to me&#8211;and if he manages to achieve all of this stabilization, it still leaves room for a Democrat who would follow similar policies, but would perhaps be more overtly gay-friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
