<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Withers: The internet keeps those crazy rumors alive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/100830-internet-election-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/100830-internet-election-rumors/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacksteel</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/100830-internet-election-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-27312</link>
		<dc:creator>blacksteel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3963#comment-27312</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. I wonder where &quot;Wayne&quot; is around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I wonder where &#8220;Wayne&#8221; is around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jungblut</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/100830-internet-election-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-27272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jungblut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3963#comment-27272</guid>
		<description>Dear nutjob in Cleveland:

Obama could have been born in China ... or on Jupiter for all I care. It still wouldn&#039;t get me to vote for McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear nutjob in Cleveland:</p>
<p>Obama could have been born in China &#8230; or on Jupiter for all I care. It still wouldn&#8217;t get me to vote for McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H Rand</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/100830-internet-election-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-27270</link>
		<dc:creator>H Rand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3963#comment-27270</guid>
		<description>Media personnel, 
 
I wrote this last night and am sending it to several news sources.  You&#039;re some 
of them.... 
 
I know there is a lot of ridiculous stuff floating around out there surrounding 
Obama&#039;s birth certificate.  Because of the ridiculous nature of a lot of it, 
everyone is just assuming it&#039;s all garbage.  Most of it is.  But the stench 
coming from most of it, valid or not, is a result of a garbage heap that is very 
real as it relates to the topic.  The fact is, the Obama campaign has skirted 
this issue very quietly for months now.  &quot;You&#039;re a loon Hank, let it go.&quot;  
Seriously, I&#039;m not one of those crazies.  Please, spend a few minutes, expel 
your knee jerk reactions, and consider a few facts... 
 
Einstein said, &quot;Common sense is a collection of prejudices acquired by age 18&quot;.  
With that in mind, and the prospect that this might actually be a HUGE story, 
I&#039;d ask you to consider that what I&#039;ve written (below), is in fact possible - 
and based on varying facts, may even be probable.  And if this is true, which 
again, read and decide for yourself....it will decidely reflect the greatest 
fraud ever perpetrated on or against the American people and political process.  
It&#039;s kind of big news.  If warranted, please help me &quot;break&quot; it. 
 
Take just 4-5 minutes to read and consider.... 
 
Thank you. 
 
P.S.  &quot;Hank Rand&quot; is a pen name.  As this is potentially a crushing story, I 
have chosen to protect my identity.  I am a 31 year old sales professional in 
Cleveland, Ohio - and will discuss this furter without anonymity, providing it 
gets some real credence.  Thanks. 
 
**************** 
 
Right-wing, conspiracy-theorist nut jobs!! 
 
I don&#039;t wear tin foil hats.  I really don&#039;t care about the font, or the word 
&quot;AFRICAN&quot; instead of the widely-used word of &quot;NEGRO&quot; or &quot;BLACK&quot; in 1961.  The 
borders make absolutely no difference, to me.  If you peel back the layers, and 
claim to find the word &quot;Adobe&quot; embedded in the electronic document - this means 
nothing to me.  Frankly, I don&#039;t even know what a &quot;halo&quot; around a word is.  The 
mystery surrounding Barack Obama&#039;s &quot;Certificate of Live Birth&quot;, is in fact no 
mystery at all.  The document is authentic, and this cannot be disputed. 
 
But I firmly believe Senator Obama is hiding something, and I urge you to take a 
few minutes to consider the facts and decide for yourself if you agree... 
 
After several unrequited requests, the Obama campaign did finally present a 
document which they claimed validated his eligibility (per the Constitution of 
the Unted States, Article II, Section I) as a &quot;Natural born citizen&quot; to have his 
name on the ballot in contention for the office of the President of the United 
States of America.  
 
However, contrary to what most onlookers have concurred, what the Obama campaign 
supplied was not, in fact, a &quot;birth certificate&quot;.  What they supplied was 
actually a &quot;Certificate of Live Birth.&quot;  There is a major difference between a 
&quot;birth certificate&quot; and a &quot;Certificate of Live Birth.&quot;  Aside from the level of 
detail differentiating the documents (hospital of record, doctor, height, 
weight, etc) - in the state of Hawaii, one authenticates natural born 
citizenship, and the other doesn&#039;t.  This part is important, and again - it has 
nothing to do with tin foil hats.  Per the State of Hawaii&#039;s Department of 
Health, &quot;Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the 
Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who 
already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a 
person born in a foreign country.&quot;  (For citation purposes, please feel free to 
visit their site: 
http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html ).  
 
Why is this important?  The &quot;Certificate of Live Birth&quot; provided by Obama, is in 
fact, a derivative of the &quot;Amended certificates of birth&quot; they cite.  Why is 
that important?  Because per the second clause in the above citation, while you 
may earn citizenship via such a document, you do not necessarily earn &quot;natural 
born&quot; citizenship.  &quot;Natural born citizenship&quot; is what is required to be 
eligible to be considered for the Presidency, per the United States 
Constitution.  
 
So where does this leave us?  Well for starters, it leaves many of us....some in 
tin foil hats, some not....wondering why the Obama campaign did not supply the 
definitive, actual, long-form birth certificate.  Contentions are, because one 
such authentic certificate does not exist.  
 
&quot;That&#039;s a pretty distant plea, from the far right, wouldn&#039;t you say?  I mean he 
couldn&#039;t have gotten this far without being properly vetted, right?&quot;  That is 
the assumption that most people are making.  &quot;This isn&#039;t possible.  You&#039;re out 
of your mind.  Get off the internet.&quot;  People have made the assumption, but 
that&#039;s all they&#039;ve made....the assumption.  Fact: Senator Barack Obama is yet to 
provide an actual birth certificate to any governing or other body, validating 
his eligibility, per the United States Constitution, to have his name on the 
ballot as the next, prospective President of the United States of America. 
 
When the Obama campaign, after several unrequited requests, did finally submit 
the &quot;Certificate of Live Birth&quot;, in an effort to more formally properly vet and 
lend credence to the Senator&#039;s run for the Presidency - which governing body did 
they submit it to?  Was it to the Board of Elections?  No, not there.  Was it to 
the Federal Elections Commission?  No, not there either.  Well then it must have 
been to the Democratic National Committee, right?  Wrong again.  The Obama 
campaign chose as their advocate-for-legitimacy, none other than 
www.factcheck.org .  Yes, a non-governing, unofficial website.  Adding further 
mystification and fuel to the &quot;conspiracy whack job&quot; fire....like it or not, 
www.factcheck.org is a product and entity of the Annenberg Foundation; the very 
foundation that coupled Barack Obama with Bill Ayers, and Senator Obama worked 
so vigorously to denounce.  
 
&quot;Hey, come on.  Now you&#039;re just getting too far fetched.&quot;  Facts are facts.  
However, let&#039;s get away from the fact that the sole body the Obama campaign 
relied on to provide legitimacy to his &quot;Certificate of Live Birth&quot; was birthed 
itself, from the very Foundation that partnered Senator Obama with Bill Ayers.  
There is still yet another legitimate question, barring that fact:  Why a 
website?.... 
 
Why not the Board of Elections?  Why not the Federal Election Commission?  Why 
not the Democratic National Committee?  It may very well be because they likely 
chose not to draw undue attention to &quot;proof&quot; that they ultimately knew was 
accompanied by zero actual credibility. By handing a &quot;Certificate of Live Birth&quot; 
over to a true governing body as &quot;proof&quot;, the burden is then on that governing 
body to put their own credibility on the line and provide advocacy for that 
proof.  Rather, however, given the illegitimacy of a &quot;Certificate of Live Birth&quot; 
as being proof of anything at all regarding natural born citizenship, they would 
have been forced to effectively say, &quot;This means nothing. And now that you&#039;ve 
brought it our attention, and asked for us to put our name on the line as 
complicit in validating your &#039;natural born citizenship&#039;, we&#039;re going to need the 
actual birth certificate. And if you can&#039;t provide it, apologetically, we 
absolutely can&#039;t cite what you&#039;ve given us as validation.&quot; So what did they do?  
They sent it to www.factcheck.org, knowing full well it would be embraced and 
credited by the allegedly non-partisan website. 
 
And who stepped up after that and asked questions?  No one.  Wait, that&#039;s 
wrong....the &quot;nut job, tin foil-hat-wearing right wing conspiracy theorists&quot; 
did. 
 
In August, &quot;nut job, tin foil-hat-wearing right wing conspiracy theorist&quot;, 
lifetime Democrat, former US Deputy Attorney General for the State of 
Pennyslvania, Philip Berg, challenged Barack Obama in court - seeking to 
ultimately compel him to produce an actual birth certificate.  After months of 
fighting this, and months of expending time, money and resources by the Obama 
campaign - the case was ultimately thrown out.  &quot;Well if the case was thrown 
out, it must mean it was baseless.&quot;  Wrong again.  The case was thrown out, not 
unlike the one against Ohio&#039;s SOS, Jennifer Brunner, due to the standing of the 
party that brought the case, to do so.  There was no decision on merit.  There 
was no ruling.  There was only the citation that a citizen could not bring the 
charge.  But still, the question remained, why did the Obama campaign, or 
rather, Barack Obama himself - who the case was brought against, not quell the 
charge entirely by simply producing an actual, authentic, long-form birth 
certificate....thereby validating his eligibility to be complicit with the 
United States Constitution, Section II, Article I, prove his natural born 
citizenship, and march comfortably through the rest of a fair, tested, and 
properly vetted election process?  This time, I have no answer.  Do you?  Does 
he?  Many of us are waiting. 
 
He had plenty of time to manufacture and execute and incredible campaign.  
Outspending his opponent by estimates of up to 5 to 1, he certainly had 
resources.  He did find time, amidst this very quiet and clearly extraordinarily 
tricky trial that the media mostly would not touch, due to the &quot;nut job&quot; nature 
of the theories - to go to the state in question, Hawaii, to visit his 
grandmother.  When did he have time to make this trip?  Not only at the tail end 
of the election, but coincidentally - at the tail end of the trial questioning 
his natural born citizenship, in fact only a few days after he and his attorneys 
watched the clock expire on the court-recognized demand by the Plaintiff to 
produce the document.  And what came of that trip?  Well, &quot;granny&quot; is doing 
fine....but interestingly enough, immediately after his one day trip in which he 
had time to meet with her, the Governor of Hawaii sealed off all access to all 
documentation pertaining to the matter.  But alas, no time or resources to 
actually hand a piece of paper over to the courts, the Board of Elections, the 
Federal Elections Commission or even the Democratic National Committee. 
 
&quot;Well Hank, that law in the Constitution is pretty minor compared to what Barack 
Obama will do for us as President.&quot;  That&#039;s very, very questionable - to anyone 
who truly understands the nature of capitalism and/or national security.  
Actually, that&#039;s an unfair statement.  I would say, in the opinions of many, 
many Americans - that&#039;s very questionable to those who believe they, or Senator 
Obama&#039;s opponent, better understand the nature of capitalism and/or national 
security, than does Senator Obama.  So let&#039;s not ignore the Constitution 
entirely, just because potentially a little more than half of the voters believe 
he&#039;s the man for the job.  Afterall, I may very well be considered able-minded 
to more responsibly and effectively spend $100,000.00 better than a bank or it&#039;s 
customers....but this doesn&#039;t give me the authority to go in and steal it. 
 
Obama has not yet properly disclosed the one document that would remove all 
doubt, and properly vet him for the position he has pursued, by way of the trust 
of the American people and the hundreds of millions of dollars of contributions 
they have handed over to him, and his effort.  He simply, has not yet done this.  
 
He has given a less credible document to a website enabled and hosted by a 
foundation Barack Obama worked under, to provide advocacy on the issue.  But 
that document authenticates the claim the same way hearsay ineffectively would 
support a defendant&#039;s testimony.  It is still, one removed from the actual 
truth.  No.  In fact it&#039;s even less credible than that.  The fact is, the 
contention of Philip Berg is that Barack Obama was actually born in Kenya, per a 
hospital record that allegedly exists there for Barack Hussein Obama II, as well 
as his paternal grandmothers proud citations of having been in the delivery room 
in Kenya when he was born.  The document Senator Obama provided the website, per 
the Hawaii Department of Health, could be attained by someone who was not born 
in the United States.  It&#039;s effectively moot.  This is the Presidency of the 
United States of America.  This is a matter of upholding a basic fundamental of 
the United States Constitution.  These are bases of signficant stature.  I have 
seen many people get many passes, but this simply cannot be one of them.  
Whatever may or may not be done in the next 4-8 years, is entirely insignificant 
relative to what will happen to our process, and the indiscretion &quot;We the 
people&quot; allow to occur by affording someone the ability to cheat the American 
people on his way to the most powerful position on the entire planet.  
 
He may not have known Bill Ayers was an unrepentent domestic terrorist when he 
sat in his living room and arguably launched his political career.  He may have 
been 8 years old when Ayers committed these acts, but at 40 years old....he may 
not have heard him repeatedly declare that he was not remorseful for his 
terrorist behavior.  It may have been coincidental that Ayers and Obama both 
gave interviews within a week of each other in September of 2001, where they 
each discussed the importance of the redistribution of wealth.  He might really 
have slept through 20 years of Jeremiah Wright&#039;s sermons, never once hearing the 
race-filled propoganda and anti-American sentiments we all eventually caught 
wind of.  Perhaps it slipped his mind when he claimed to have no ties to ACORN, 
that he led training sessions for them....or contributed over $800,000.00 to 
their umbrella for the 2008 election season.  Maybe that&#039;s all true.  
 
What part of &quot;natural born citizenship&quot; escaped him though?  This one, I have to 
hear.  And if it&#039;s an illegitimate question, then I would plead with Senator 
Obama to retain all the money he&#039;s expending fighting the multiple cases that 
have popped up across the country, once and for all provide proof of his natural 
born citizenship by way of an actual birth certificate, and....I don&#039;t know, 
maybe give what he would have spent on the trials to the middle class he is so 
concerned about - while salvaging the integrity of the most important process we 
have, in the nation he loves so much. 
 
H. Rand 
Cleveland, Ohio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media personnel, </p>
<p>I wrote this last night and am sending it to several news sources.  You&#8217;re some<br />
of them&#8230;. </p>
<p>I know there is a lot of ridiculous stuff floating around out there surrounding<br />
Obama&#8217;s birth certificate.  Because of the ridiculous nature of a lot of it,<br />
everyone is just assuming it&#8217;s all garbage.  Most of it is.  But the stench<br />
coming from most of it, valid or not, is a result of a garbage heap that is very<br />
real as it relates to the topic.  The fact is, the Obama campaign has skirted<br />
this issue very quietly for months now.  &#8220;You&#8217;re a loon Hank, let it go.&#8221;<br />
Seriously, I&#8217;m not one of those crazies.  Please, spend a few minutes, expel<br />
your knee jerk reactions, and consider a few facts&#8230; </p>
<p>Einstein said, &#8220;Common sense is a collection of prejudices acquired by age 18&#8243;.<br />
With that in mind, and the prospect that this might actually be a HUGE story,<br />
I&#8217;d ask you to consider that what I&#8217;ve written (below), is in fact possible &#8211;<br />
and based on varying facts, may even be probable.  And if this is true, which<br />
again, read and decide for yourself&#8230;.it will decidely reflect the greatest<br />
fraud ever perpetrated on or against the American people and political process.<br />
It&#8217;s kind of big news.  If warranted, please help me &#8220;break&#8221; it. </p>
<p>Take just 4-5 minutes to read and consider&#8230;. </p>
<p>Thank you. </p>
<p>P.S.  &#8220;Hank Rand&#8221; is a pen name.  As this is potentially a crushing story, I<br />
have chosen to protect my identity.  I am a 31 year old sales professional in<br />
Cleveland, Ohio &#8211; and will discuss this furter without anonymity, providing it<br />
gets some real credence.  Thanks. </p>
<p>**************** </p>
<p>Right-wing, conspiracy-theorist nut jobs!! </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t wear tin foil hats.  I really don&#8217;t care about the font, or the word<br />
&#8220;AFRICAN&#8221; instead of the widely-used word of &#8220;NEGRO&#8221; or &#8220;BLACK&#8221; in 1961.  The<br />
borders make absolutely no difference, to me.  If you peel back the layers, and<br />
claim to find the word &#8220;Adobe&#8221; embedded in the electronic document &#8211; this means<br />
nothing to me.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t even know what a &#8220;halo&#8221; around a word is.  The<br />
mystery surrounding Barack Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth&#8221;, is in fact no<br />
mystery at all.  The document is authentic, and this cannot be disputed. </p>
<p>But I firmly believe Senator Obama is hiding something, and I urge you to take a<br />
few minutes to consider the facts and decide for yourself if you agree&#8230; </p>
<p>After several unrequited requests, the Obama campaign did finally present a<br />
document which they claimed validated his eligibility (per the Constitution of<br />
the Unted States, Article II, Section I) as a &#8220;Natural born citizen&#8221; to have his<br />
name on the ballot in contention for the office of the President of the United<br />
States of America.  </p>
<p>However, contrary to what most onlookers have concurred, what the Obama campaign<br />
supplied was not, in fact, a &#8220;birth certificate&#8221;.  What they supplied was<br />
actually a &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth.&#8221;  There is a major difference between a<br />
&#8220;birth certificate&#8221; and a &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth.&#8221;  Aside from the level of<br />
detail differentiating the documents (hospital of record, doctor, height,<br />
weight, etc) &#8211; in the state of Hawaii, one authenticates natural born<br />
citizenship, and the other doesn&#8217;t.  This part is important, and again &#8211; it has<br />
nothing to do with tin foil hats.  Per the State of Hawaii&#8217;s Department of<br />
Health, &#8220;Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the<br />
Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who<br />
already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a<br />
person born in a foreign country.&#8221;  (For citation purposes, please feel free to<br />
visit their site:<br />
<a href="http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html</a> ).  </p>
<p>Why is this important?  The &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth&#8221; provided by Obama, is in<br />
fact, a derivative of the &#8220;Amended certificates of birth&#8221; they cite.  Why is<br />
that important?  Because per the second clause in the above citation, while you<br />
may earn citizenship via such a document, you do not necessarily earn &#8220;natural<br />
born&#8221; citizenship.  &#8220;Natural born citizenship&#8221; is what is required to be<br />
eligible to be considered for the Presidency, per the United States<br />
Constitution.  </p>
<p>So where does this leave us?  Well for starters, it leaves many of us&#8230;.some in<br />
tin foil hats, some not&#8230;.wondering why the Obama campaign did not supply the<br />
definitive, actual, long-form birth certificate.  Contentions are, because one<br />
such authentic certificate does not exist.  </p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s a pretty distant plea, from the far right, wouldn&#8217;t you say?  I mean he<br />
couldn&#8217;t have gotten this far without being properly vetted, right?&#8221;  That is<br />
the assumption that most people are making.  &#8220;This isn&#8217;t possible.  You&#8217;re out<br />
of your mind.  Get off the internet.&#8221;  People have made the assumption, but<br />
that&#8217;s all they&#8217;ve made&#8230;.the assumption.  Fact: Senator Barack Obama is yet to<br />
provide an actual birth certificate to any governing or other body, validating<br />
his eligibility, per the United States Constitution, to have his name on the<br />
ballot as the next, prospective President of the United States of America. </p>
<p>When the Obama campaign, after several unrequited requests, did finally submit<br />
the &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth&#8221;, in an effort to more formally properly vet and<br />
lend credence to the Senator&#8217;s run for the Presidency &#8211; which governing body did<br />
they submit it to?  Was it to the Board of Elections?  No, not there.  Was it to<br />
the Federal Elections Commission?  No, not there either.  Well then it must have<br />
been to the Democratic National Committee, right?  Wrong again.  The Obama<br />
campaign chose as their advocate-for-legitimacy, none other than<br />
<a href="http://www.factcheck.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org</a> .  Yes, a non-governing, unofficial website.  Adding further<br />
mystification and fuel to the &#8220;conspiracy whack job&#8221; fire&#8230;.like it or not,<br />
<a href="http://www.factcheck.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org</a> is a product and entity of the Annenberg Foundation; the very<br />
foundation that coupled Barack Obama with Bill Ayers, and Senator Obama worked<br />
so vigorously to denounce.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, come on.  Now you&#8217;re just getting too far fetched.&#8221;  Facts are facts.<br />
However, let&#8217;s get away from the fact that the sole body the Obama campaign<br />
relied on to provide legitimacy to his &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth&#8221; was birthed<br />
itself, from the very Foundation that partnered Senator Obama with Bill Ayers.<br />
There is still yet another legitimate question, barring that fact:  Why a<br />
website?&#8230;. </p>
<p>Why not the Board of Elections?  Why not the Federal Election Commission?  Why<br />
not the Democratic National Committee?  It may very well be because they likely<br />
chose not to draw undue attention to &#8220;proof&#8221; that they ultimately knew was<br />
accompanied by zero actual credibility. By handing a &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth&#8221;<br />
over to a true governing body as &#8220;proof&#8221;, the burden is then on that governing<br />
body to put their own credibility on the line and provide advocacy for that<br />
proof.  Rather, however, given the illegitimacy of a &#8220;Certificate of Live Birth&#8221;<br />
as being proof of anything at all regarding natural born citizenship, they would<br />
have been forced to effectively say, &#8220;This means nothing. And now that you&#8217;ve<br />
brought it our attention, and asked for us to put our name on the line as<br />
complicit in validating your &#8216;natural born citizenship&#8217;, we&#8217;re going to need the<br />
actual birth certificate. And if you can&#8217;t provide it, apologetically, we<br />
absolutely can&#8217;t cite what you&#8217;ve given us as validation.&#8221; So what did they do?<br />
They sent it to <a href="http://www.factcheck.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org</a>, knowing full well it would be embraced and<br />
credited by the allegedly non-partisan website. </p>
<p>And who stepped up after that and asked questions?  No one.  Wait, that&#8217;s<br />
wrong&#8230;.the &#8220;nut job, tin foil-hat-wearing right wing conspiracy theorists&#8221;<br />
did. </p>
<p>In August, &#8220;nut job, tin foil-hat-wearing right wing conspiracy theorist&#8221;,<br />
lifetime Democrat, former US Deputy Attorney General for the State of<br />
Pennyslvania, Philip Berg, challenged Barack Obama in court &#8211; seeking to<br />
ultimately compel him to produce an actual birth certificate.  After months of<br />
fighting this, and months of expending time, money and resources by the Obama<br />
campaign &#8211; the case was ultimately thrown out.  &#8220;Well if the case was thrown<br />
out, it must mean it was baseless.&#8221;  Wrong again.  The case was thrown out, not<br />
unlike the one against Ohio&#8217;s SOS, Jennifer Brunner, due to the standing of the<br />
party that brought the case, to do so.  There was no decision on merit.  There<br />
was no ruling.  There was only the citation that a citizen could not bring the<br />
charge.  But still, the question remained, why did the Obama campaign, or<br />
rather, Barack Obama himself &#8211; who the case was brought against, not quell the<br />
charge entirely by simply producing an actual, authentic, long-form birth<br />
certificate&#8230;.thereby validating his eligibility to be complicit with the<br />
United States Constitution, Section II, Article I, prove his natural born<br />
citizenship, and march comfortably through the rest of a fair, tested, and<br />
properly vetted election process?  This time, I have no answer.  Do you?  Does<br />
he?  Many of us are waiting. </p>
<p>He had plenty of time to manufacture and execute and incredible campaign.<br />
Outspending his opponent by estimates of up to 5 to 1, he certainly had<br />
resources.  He did find time, amidst this very quiet and clearly extraordinarily<br />
tricky trial that the media mostly would not touch, due to the &#8220;nut job&#8221; nature<br />
of the theories &#8211; to go to the state in question, Hawaii, to visit his<br />
grandmother.  When did he have time to make this trip?  Not only at the tail end<br />
of the election, but coincidentally &#8211; at the tail end of the trial questioning<br />
his natural born citizenship, in fact only a few days after he and his attorneys<br />
watched the clock expire on the court-recognized demand by the Plaintiff to<br />
produce the document.  And what came of that trip?  Well, &#8220;granny&#8221; is doing<br />
fine&#8230;.but interestingly enough, immediately after his one day trip in which he<br />
had time to meet with her, the Governor of Hawaii sealed off all access to all<br />
documentation pertaining to the matter.  But alas, no time or resources to<br />
actually hand a piece of paper over to the courts, the Board of Elections, the<br />
Federal Elections Commission or even the Democratic National Committee. </p>
<p>&#8220;Well Hank, that law in the Constitution is pretty minor compared to what Barack<br />
Obama will do for us as President.&#8221;  That&#8217;s very, very questionable &#8211; to anyone<br />
who truly understands the nature of capitalism and/or national security.<br />
Actually, that&#8217;s an unfair statement.  I would say, in the opinions of many,<br />
many Americans &#8211; that&#8217;s very questionable to those who believe they, or Senator<br />
Obama&#8217;s opponent, better understand the nature of capitalism and/or national<br />
security, than does Senator Obama.  So let&#8217;s not ignore the Constitution<br />
entirely, just because potentially a little more than half of the voters believe<br />
he&#8217;s the man for the job.  Afterall, I may very well be considered able-minded<br />
to more responsibly and effectively spend $100,000.00 better than a bank or it&#8217;s<br />
customers&#8230;.but this doesn&#8217;t give me the authority to go in and steal it. </p>
<p>Obama has not yet properly disclosed the one document that would remove all<br />
doubt, and properly vet him for the position he has pursued, by way of the trust<br />
of the American people and the hundreds of millions of dollars of contributions<br />
they have handed over to him, and his effort.  He simply, has not yet done this.  </p>
<p>He has given a less credible document to a website enabled and hosted by a<br />
foundation Barack Obama worked under, to provide advocacy on the issue.  But<br />
that document authenticates the claim the same way hearsay ineffectively would<br />
support a defendant&#8217;s testimony.  It is still, one removed from the actual<br />
truth.  No.  In fact it&#8217;s even less credible than that.  The fact is, the<br />
contention of Philip Berg is that Barack Obama was actually born in Kenya, per a<br />
hospital record that allegedly exists there for Barack Hussein Obama II, as well<br />
as his paternal grandmothers proud citations of having been in the delivery room<br />
in Kenya when he was born.  The document Senator Obama provided the website, per<br />
the Hawaii Department of Health, could be attained by someone who was not born<br />
in the United States.  It&#8217;s effectively moot.  This is the Presidency of the<br />
United States of America.  This is a matter of upholding a basic fundamental of<br />
the United States Constitution.  These are bases of signficant stature.  I have<br />
seen many people get many passes, but this simply cannot be one of them.<br />
Whatever may or may not be done in the next 4-8 years, is entirely insignificant<br />
relative to what will happen to our process, and the indiscretion &#8220;We the<br />
people&#8221; allow to occur by affording someone the ability to cheat the American<br />
people on his way to the most powerful position on the entire planet.  </p>
<p>He may not have known Bill Ayers was an unrepentent domestic terrorist when he<br />
sat in his living room and arguably launched his political career.  He may have<br />
been 8 years old when Ayers committed these acts, but at 40 years old&#8230;.he may<br />
not have heard him repeatedly declare that he was not remorseful for his<br />
terrorist behavior.  It may have been coincidental that Ayers and Obama both<br />
gave interviews within a week of each other in September of 2001, where they<br />
each discussed the importance of the redistribution of wealth.  He might really<br />
have slept through 20 years of Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s sermons, never once hearing the<br />
race-filled propoganda and anti-American sentiments we all eventually caught<br />
wind of.  Perhaps it slipped his mind when he claimed to have no ties to ACORN,<br />
that he led training sessions for them&#8230;.or contributed over $800,000.00 to<br />
their umbrella for the 2008 election season.  Maybe that&#8217;s all true.  </p>
<p>What part of &#8220;natural born citizenship&#8221; escaped him though?  This one, I have to<br />
hear.  And if it&#8217;s an illegitimate question, then I would plead with Senator<br />
Obama to retain all the money he&#8217;s expending fighting the multiple cases that<br />
have popped up across the country, once and for all provide proof of his natural<br />
born citizenship by way of an actual birth certificate, and&#8230;.I don&#8217;t know,<br />
maybe give what he would have spent on the trials to the middle class he is so<br />
concerned about &#8211; while salvaging the integrity of the most important process we<br />
have, in the nation he loves so much. </p>
<p>H. Rand<br />
Cleveland, Ohio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
