Set homepage script- Works in both Netscape and IE 4 and up Daily Email Updates | Bookmark Us | RSS Feed

  Google Web 365Gay

  News  

  Entertainment   Lifestyle       Travel      Opinion   Health     Sports   Business

Week In Review    |    Columnists   |   Your Weathe  |   Business News    |   LGBT History

News

 

 

Today's Top Stories      Print Page      
   



















Calif. Supreme Court Urged To Strike Down Gay Marriage Ban
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff

Posted: April 2, 2007 - 3:00 pm ET 

(San Francisco, California) The California Supreme Court was urged Monday to strike down as unconstitutional a law that bars same-sex couples from marriage.  

In a brief filed jointly by Lambda Legal, the National Center for Lesbian Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union, on behalf of 15 same-sex couples and California LGBT rights group Equality California, the attorneys argue that California state law barring same-sex couples from marriage discriminates based on sexual orientation and sex and violates the fundamental right to marry.

The brief cites the California Constitution's guarantees of privacy, intimate association, and due process.

"More same-sex couples live in California than in any other state," said Shannon Minter, Legal Director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights.  

"Barring these committed couples from marriage is harmful and unfair.  A person's sexual orientation is irrelevant to their ability to forge enduring human bonds and to create a family.  Marriage is a cherished legal protection, and it should be equally available to all." 

The California Supreme Court agreed to hear the case after the California Court of Appeal reversed a decision by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard A. Kramer finding that barring same-sex couples from marriage unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of sex and violates the fundamental right to marry.

"We are hopeful that the California Supreme Court will recognize that same-sex couples form committed relationships just like straight couples and shouldn't be barred from the dignity and universal recognition that comes with marriage," said Alex Cleghorn, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California.  

"While domestic partnerships provide families with some legal protections, the marriage ban is a painful reminder that same-sex relationships are considered unworthy of marriage."

Lambda Legal Senior Counsel Jennifer C. Pizer said that despite California's domestic partner law many lesbians and gay men in partnerships throughout the state have found that without access to marriage they and their families are still vulnerable under the law.

"Lesbian and gay couples in domestic partnerships are constantly having to prove that their relationships are entitled to legal protections and basic respect -- but because people don't understand and fully respect domestic partnerships, couples face significant hardships," said Pizer. 

The 15 couples in the state have made life-long commitments to each other, the attorney said.  

Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin have been together more than 50 years.  Karen Shane and Judy Sokolower have been together more than 30 years.  

The couples come from throughout the state and from all walks of life, with some working in business, some in education, and others in health professions.  Many are raising children together. Others are retired.

The city of San Francisco also filed a brief supporting same-sex marriage on Monday.

"We are asking the California Supreme Court not only to assert the rights of equality and privacy uniquely enshrined in our state Constitution, but to reassert the judiciary's rightful role in interpreting it - something the appellate court failed to do," San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said.

In 2005, the California Legislature passed AB 849 (Leno), the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act, which would allow same-sex couples to marry in California. 

The bill was vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

A similar bill, AB 43 (Leno) was reintroduced in December of last year and will be heard in committee later this month. Schwarzenegger has warned that if it passes he will again veto it. 

The state has 30 days to respond to the arguments.  No date has been set for oral arguments.

©365Gay.com 2007

 


Today's Top Stories      Print Page      





 


Help/Feedback
 Corporate   Advertising Information   Links & Newsbox
 Daily Email Updates   Wireless Edition    Set homepage script- Works in both Netscape and IE 4 and up

365Gay.com is a wholly owned division of 365GayMedia Inc. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from 365Gay.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of 365GayMedia Inc.