Set homepage script- Works in both Netscape and IE 4 and up Daily Email Updates | Bookmark Us | PDA Version  

  Google Web 365Gay

  News  

  Entertainment   Lifestyle       Travel      Opinion   Health     Sports   Business

Week In Review    |    Columnists   |   Your Weathe  |   Business News    |   LGBT History

News

 

 

 

Today's Top Stories      Print Page      
   

Lawyers Mull US Supreme Court Appeal In Nebraska Gay Marriage Case
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff

September 9, 2006 - 11:00 am ET













(Omaha, Nebraska) Attorneys who lost an appeal of Nebraska's broad ban on any recognition of same-sex relationships say they are still considering whether to appeal the case to the US Supreme Court.

A panel on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in July overturned a lower court ruling that struck down the state's constitutional amendment, ruling that the issue is a matter of state rights and not a violation of the U-S Constitution. (story

Last month the full court declined to reconsider the ruling.  That leaves 90 days to decide whether to go to the Supreme Court. 

"We haven't made a decision at this point," Lambda Legal attorney Ken Upton tells the Associated Press.  "We have just begun weighing that option."

The Nebraska amendment bans any and all forms of legal recognition for same-sex relationships, including domestic partnerships and other basic protections. 

While it is more sweeping than amendments to constitutions in most other states that ban same-sex marriage taking the case to the Supreme Court now could potentially harm the outcomes of cases in other states.

Upton said that a decision will be made in consultation with the ACLU's Lesbian and Gay Project, the other group with which Lambda launched the original court challenge. 

The amendment was passed in 2000 with 70 percent of the vote and the two civil rights groups filed a lawsuit.

Lambda Legal called it "the most extreme antigay family law in the nation.

In May 2005 a federal judge struck down the measure saying it was too sweeping. (story)  

U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon ruled the measure interferes not only with the rights of gay couples but also with foster parents, adopted children and people in a host of other living arrangements.

Bataillon said the ban "imposes significant burdens on both the expressive and intimate associational rights" of gays and lesbians and "creates a significant barrier to the plaintiffs' right to petition or to participate in the political process."

The state appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

 ©365Gay.com 2006


Today's Top Stories      Print Page      





 


Help/Feedback
 Corporate   Advertising Information   Links & Newsbox
 Daily Email Updates   Wireless Edition    Set homepage script- Works in both Netscape and IE 4 and up

365Gay.com is a wholly owned division of 365GayMedia Inc. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from 365Gay.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of 365GayMedia Inc.